A Correlation between First-void Morning Urinary Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) and 24 Hours Urinary Protein in Pregnancy with Suspected Preeclampsia

Main Article Content

Pimchanok Pariyaeksut
Tripop lertbunnaphong
Jarunee Leetheeragul
Dittakarn Boriboonhirunsarn

Abstract

Objective:   To evaluate a correlation between first-void morning urinary protein to creatinine ratio (UPCR) and 24-hour urine protein in pregnant women suspected of preeclampsia.


Materials and Methods:   A total of 40 pregnant women suspected of preeclampsia were enrolled and admitted for 24-hour urine collection. Collected urine was divided into 2 parts, first-void morning urine and the remaining. First-void morning UPCR was determined and 24-hour urine protein was calculated by a combination of protein from both specimens. Significant proteinuria was diagnosed if the total 24-hour urine protein was greater than 300 mg. A correlation between first-void morning UPCR and 24-hour urine protein was estimated using Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r).


Results:  Mean age was 31.0 ± 7.0 years and mean gestational age was 33.2 ± 4.6 weeks. Eight patients (20%) had significant proteinuria and were diagnosed as preeclampsia. A correlation between first-void morning UPCR and 24-hour urine protein showed a significant positive correlation with coefficient (r) of 0.76, p < 0.001. At the cut-off value of 0.3, first-void morning UPCR had sensitivity of 87.5% (95% CI 46.7 – 99.3) specificity of 96.9% (95% CI 82.0 – 99.8) for diagnosis of significant proteinuria.


Conclusion: First-void morning UPCR significantly correlated with 24-hour urine protein. It should be considered as an alternative method for detecting significant proteinuria in women suspected of preeclampsia.

Article Details

How to Cite
(1)
Pariyaeksut, P.; lertbunnaphong, T.; Leetheeragul, J.; Boriboonhirunsarn, D. A Correlation Between First-Void Morning Urinary Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) and 24 Hours Urinary Protein in Pregnancy With Suspected Preeclampsia. Thai J Obstet Gynaecol 2014, 22, 173-180.
Section
Original Article