Strategic approach to effective brainstorming

  • สุริโย ชูจันทร์ Office of Disease Prevention and Control Region 11, Nakhon Si Thammarat
  • อดิศักดิ์ ภูมิรัตน์ Center of Eco Health Education and Research (CEER), Faculty of Public Health, Thammasat University, Rangsit Campus, Pathumthai
Keywords: strategic approach, brainstorming, effective

Abstract

Nominal and interactive brainstorming techniques have widely been used in the generation of numerous ideas based on specific brainstorming issues to which a diverse group of participants has responded. Here, the authors elaborated on their explicit knowledge and experience in applying these effective brainstorming techniques to develop strategic approaches to modeling an appropriately-designed malaria elimination program through malaria elimination management by the local administrative organization and multisectoral collaboration. Effective brainstorming will generate learning process and can seek the real and concrete solutions to addressing the local malaria problem, thusensuring that the target of National Malaria Elimination Strategy 2017-2026 is met.

References

1. Osborn AF. Applied imagination: principles and procedures of creative problem solving. 3rd ed. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1963.

2. De Bono E. Serious creativity: how to be creative under pressure and turn ideas into action. United Kingdom: Random House; 2015.

3. De Bono E. Serious creativity: using the power of lateral thinking to create new ideas. New York: Harper Business; 1992.

4. Brown V, Paulus PB. A simple dynamic model of social factors in group brainstorming. Small Group Res 1996;27:91-114.

5. Satitvipawee P, Wongkhang W, Pattanasin S, Hoithong P, Bhumiratana A. Predictors of malaria-association with rubber plantations in Thailand. BMC Public Health 2012;12:1115.

6. Putman VL, Paulus PB. Brainstorming, brainstorming rules and decision making. J Creat Behav 2009;43:29-40.

7. Rietzschel EF, Nijstad BA, Stroebe W. Productivity is not enough: a comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. J Exp Soc Psychol 2006;42:244-51.

8. Henningsen, DD, Henningsen MLM. Generating ideas about the uses of brainstorming: reconsidering the losses and gains of brainstorming groups relative to nominal groups. Southern Commun J 2013:78:42-55.

9. Rietzschel EF, Nijstad BA, Stroebe W. The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact. Br J Psychol 2010;101:47-68.

10. Kunifuji S. A Japanese problem solving approach: the KJ-Ho method. In: Andrzej M.J. Skulimowski, editors. Proceedings of KICSS' 2013. Kraków: Progress & Business Publishers; 2013. p. 333-8.

11. Scupin R. The KJ method: a technique for analyzing data derived from Japanese Ethnology. Human Org 1997;56:233-7.

12. Miller LE. Evidence-based instruction: a classroom experiment comparing nominal and brainstorming groups. Org Manag J 2009;6:229–38.
Published
2019-06-26
Section
Review Article