Work Ability Index and improving work conditions for informal elderly workers in Muangkaen Pattana Municipality, Chiang Mai Province

Authors

  • Siwalee Rattanapunya Chiangmai Rajabhat University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14456/dcj.2019.24

Keywords:

health risk assessment, elderly workers, informal sector, Work Ability Index, Work Improvement for Safe Home

Abstract

This study, using a mixed-method research incorporating qualitative and quantitative methods, aims to investigate work abilities and to improve working conditions of elderly workers in the informal sector in Muangkaen Pattana Municipality, Mae Taeng District,           Chiang Mai Province. Quantitative data on the Work Ability Index (WAI) was collected from 100 informal elderly workers. Then, three subgroups of elderly workers, who are (1) 8 elderly workers of broom-making group, (2) 9 older workers of crispy banana-making group, and (3) 12 elderly workers of coffin-making group, were selected to conduct a qualitative study with the aim to improve their working conditions. Results showed that most of older workers indicated that they have a moderate work ability (87.00%) and their current work ability when compared with their lifetime best was 7 points (out of 10 points). In addition, they were found to still enjoy working and remained relatively motivated and excited about their work. Based on a self-learning process related to the improvement of working environments, most study participants identified the following problems as attributable to unproductive and unsafe working conditions: musculoskeletal problems, constant exposure to chemical factors (i.e. exposure to sawdust), and work-related accidents. Therefore, key measures to be taken to improve working conditions include application and modification of existing household items to suit physical and ergonomic conditions of older people and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) as these will help them build self-confidence and self-empowerment to protect themselves from work-related hazards. It is therefore recommended that the results from this study be replicated in other groups of informal workers as well.

Author Biography

Siwalee Rattanapunya, Chiangmai Rajabhat University

Public Health

References

1. Department of Older Persons. Thailand elderly population statistics, 2016. Bangkok: Ministry of Social Development and Human Security; 2016. (in Thai)

2. Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University. Thai population health 2005: sweet scent of Lamduan Flower - preparing for the elderly society. Nakhon Pathom: Thai Health Promotion Foundation; 2007. (in Thai)

3. National Statistical Office. Jobs taken by the elderly population in Thailand in 2016. Bangkok: Ministry of Digital Economy and Society; 2017. (in Thai)

4. Crawford JO, Graveling RA, Cowie HA, Dixon K. The health safety and health promotion needs of older workers. Occup Med 2010;60:184-92.

5. Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development Institute. Situation of the Thai elderly 2016 [Internet]. [cited 2019 Feb 2]. Available from: http://thaitgri.org/?p=38427

6. National Statistical Office. Health and welfare survey 2014. Bangkok: Ministry of Technology and Communications; 2015. (in Thai)

7. Muangkaen Pattana Municipality. General local conditions [Internet]. [cited 2018 Mar 5]. Available from: http://www.muangkaen.go.th/index.php?_mod=ZGF0YWRldGFpbA&type=MQ

8. Kaewboonchoo O, Saleekul S, TomPudsa M. Model development for stress reduction and work ability promotion among the Thai workforce. Nakhon Pathom: Mahidol University; 2009. (in Thai)

9. Institute for Occupational Safety. Working conditions improvement survey for home-based workers. Bangkok: Department of Labor Protection and Welfare; 2007. (in Thai)

10. World Health Organization. Aging and work capacity. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1993.

11. Kaphuthin J. Application of WISH technique to improve working conditions, safety and hygiene of informal workers in manufacturing sector in Muang District, Surin Province. J Prev Med Assoc Thai 2011;1:45-57. (in Thai)

12. Pinto AM, da Silva Ramos SC, Nunes SM. Managing an aging workforce: what is the value of human resource management practices for different age groups of worker?. Tékhne 2014;12:58-68.

13. Kenny GP, Yardley JE, Martineau L, Jay O. Physical work capacity in older adults: implications for the aging worker. Am J Ind Med 2008;51:610-25.

14. Soer R, Brouwer S, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Groothoff JW, Reneman MF. Decline of functional capacity in healthy aging workers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:2326-32.

15. Raksasap S, Nilbai T, Intarawet N. Final report on a pilot project to study the suitability and work-worthiness of post-retirement workers. Bangkok: Bangchan Printing; 2008. (in Thai)

16. Kaewkangawan S. Psychology of life development at all ages, volume 2. 9th ed. Bangkok: Thammasat University; 2010. (in Thai)

17. Office of the Permanent Secretary. Implementation progress of the labor action plan for the elderly in fiscal year 2013 and the elderly labor action plan for fiscal year 2014. Bangkok: Ministry of Labor; 2014. (in Thai)

18. Walker A. The emergence of age management in Europe. Int J Organ Behav 2005;10:685-97.

19. Government of Western Australia. Understanding the safety and health needs of your workplace older workers and safety [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.commerce.wa.gov.au/sites/default/files/atoms/files/older_workers_guide_ .pdf

Downloads

Published

2019-09-30

How to Cite

1.
Rattanapunya S. Work Ability Index and improving work conditions for informal elderly workers in Muangkaen Pattana Municipality, Chiang Mai Province. Dis Control J [Internet]. 2019 Sep. 30 [cited 2024 Mar. 29];45(3):245-57. Available from: https://he01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/DCJ/article/view/160651

Issue

Section

Original Article