The Development of Communicable Disease and Emerging Disease Surveillance, Prevention and Control System along Thai-Myanmar and Thai-Lao PDR Border Areas, Chiang Rai Province, 2017-2018

  • เสาวณีย์ เปลี่ยนพานิช Communicable Disease Control Department, Chiang Rai Provincial Health Office
  • นรินทร์ สุริยนต์ Communicable Disease Control Department, Chiang Rai Provincial Health Office
  • พิษณุรักษ์ กันทวี School of Health Science, Mea Fah Luang University
Keywords: communicable disease, emerging disease, border Health

Abstract

Background: Chiang Rai provincial health office has implemented a project for the development of communicable disease and emerging disease surveillance, prevention and control system along Thai-Myanmar and Thai-Lao PDR border areas since 2015. Monitoring and evaluation of its progress as well as taking lessons learned from the project implementationare therefore needed in order to further improve the project and to present lessons learned to the network of organizations in the border areas. Objective: To investigate and analyze the results of the Chiang Rai’s project for communicable and emerging disease surveillance, prevention and control along the border areas of Thai, Myanmar and Lao PDR. Methods: The descriptive evaluative study design was implemented. Data were collected using questionnaires for basic demographic characteristics along with qualitative components by performing focus group discussion and in-depth interview using the CIPP model. The 1,481 participants purposely selected for the study were composed of administrators, public health staff, public health volunteers, migrant health volunteers and villagers residing in the border areas along Chiang Rai province, Laos and Myanmar. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. Results: For Thai-Lao border, it was found that most of the participants were female (56.9%). Almost all of the participants were Buddhists (83.2%). There were wide varieties of ethnicity and nationality. About 39.2% of them were farmers. For Thai- Myanmar border, most of the participants were also female (53.7%) and Buddhists (65.3%). About half of participants were Tai-yai ethnic group (50.1%), followed by Myanmar (38.6%). The most common occupation was casual laborer, which accounts for 51.0%. The outcomes of the project evaluation based on CIPP model indicated that in the context in terms of information about policy, program and project in areas bordering these two neighboring countries it was found to have been thoroughly fulfilled.  For the input, it showed that readiness concerning the budget, materials and potential of human resources in supporting implementation of activities in the areas was at a good level. The process evaluation showed that the process of implementing projects and method of solving the gap of local problems were at an appropriate level. As for the product, the project delivered the successful and distinct method of implementation. Conclusion: The project demonstrated positive and concrete outcome results in policy and local dimensions, both formal and informal implementations in a top-down fashion at the Thai-Lao border. In Thai – Myanmar border, however, the project implementation at the local level could only utilize an informal type of collaboration and resulted in its limited success. The policy recommendation based on the evaluation is that the central government policy should be implemented to advance the collaboration to adequately address communicable diseases and health threats focusing on the local area, and implementation of the twin-city and twin-village health collaboration model along Thai –Myanmar and Thai - Lao PDR border areas.

References

1. Srilapasuwan P, Wiwatwongkasem C, Kittipichai V, Narumol E, Sathiwipawee P, Sujararat D. Data analysis and conclusion of result surveillance protection and control non communicable disease, Thailand 2008-2012. Nonthaburi: Department of Disease Control and Ministry of Public Health, Mahidol University, Faculty of Public Health; 2013.

2. Bureau of Epidemiology, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health. Report of key performance indicators. Nonthaburi: Department of Disease Control, Bureau of Epidemiology; 2016.

3. Deparment Of Disease Control, Bureau of Epidemiology. International Health Regulations (IHR2005) and Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Feb 18]. Available from: http://www.boe.moph.go.th/files/meeting/IHR2015/2.pdf

4. Srithala S. The development of health promotion in community, economic zone [dissertation]. Chiang Rai: Chiang Rai Rajabhat University; 2009.

5. The project of Awareness and Communicable diseases, Emerging disease Preparing round borders of three countries; Thailand, Laos, and Myanmar, 2017. In The Joint meeting on Cross-border and Public Health between Thailand and Lao PDR; 2017; Chiang Rai Provincial Health office.

6. Border Health, Chiang Rai Provincial Health office. Meeting minute report of the project of awareness and communicable diseases, emerging disease preparing round borders of three countries; Thailand, Laos, and Myanmar, 2017. The Joint meeting on cross-border and public health between Thailand and Lao PDR; 2017. 2017 Mar 21-23; Chiang Rai Grandroom Hotel, Chiang Rai. Chiang Rai: 2017. p. 1-54.

7. Strategy and Planning Division, Ministry of Public Health. Ministry of Public Health Strategy 2016 (Strategic Focus) [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2018 Feb 18]. Available from: http://bps.moph.go.th/new_bps/sites/default/files/mophplan_2559_final_0.pdf

8. Rangsukkul Y. The evaluation project: concept and practice. Bankkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House; 1999.

9. Watanasuntorn K. Application of Stufflebeam’s CIPP model for education project evaluation. Suranaree J Soc Sci 2008;2:67-83.

10. Punturat S. Statistics for educational research [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Jan 23]. Available from: https://home.kku.ac.th/sompo_pu/spweb/stat/part4.pdf

11. Punturat S. Quantitative research [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 23 Jan]. Available from: https://home.kku.ac.th/sompo_pu/spweb/research/701.ppt

12. USC Libraries. Organizing your social sciences research paper: qualitative methods [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2018 Feb 13]. Available from: http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/qualitative

13. Vorapongsatorn T. Descritive statistics. [Online].2016 [cited 2018 Jan 12]. Available from: http://oec.anamai.moph.go.th/download/OEC_2016/MEETTING2561/FEB2561/18_21FEB/4.Descriptive%20Statistics%20กรมอนามัย%2019-21%20กพ%2061.pdf

14. The Development of Stategy, Chiang Rai Provincial Health Office. The number of cases/ death cases 2015-2017. Chiang Rai: Chiang Rai Provincial Health Office, Data and Evaluation group; 2018.

15. Buosonte R. CIPP and CIPPIEST evalvation models: mistaken and precise concepts of applications. Silpakorn Education Research Journal 2012;5:7-24.

16. Ritcharoon P. Training project evaluation: concepts, models, and evaluation process. STOU Education Journal 2017;10:42-57.

17. Shijaroeng A. Evaluation project: planning of southern problem solving in Pakistan (Karachi), consulate. Bangkok: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Devawongse Varopakarn Institute of Foreign Affairs; 2017.

18. Zaleznik A, Christensen CR, Roethlisberger FJ. The motivation, productivity, and satisfaction of workers: a prediction study. Boston: Harvard University, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration; 1958.

19. Yawaphapad S. Public policy. 3rd ed. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House; 1997.

20. Strategy and Planning Division. Ministry of Publice Health. Border Health Planning 2017-2021 [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Dec 11]. Available from: http://www.boe.moph.go.th/files/meeting/IHR2017/3.pdf
Published
2019-03-27
Section
Original Article