The Effects of Using Kolb's Experience Learning Activities to Develop Teacher Collective Leadership in Bangkok Metropolitan Schools
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this research were 1) to study the effect of using teacher collective leadership model in Bangkok Metropolitan Schools, concerning to the collective leadership and teamwork competencies in different groups and period of time, 2) to study the satisfaction of teachers toward the teacher collective leadership development model. The samples consisted of 72 teachers, in Bangkok Metropolitan Schools in the academic year, 2017. Which was divided into two groups, experimental and control groups, each group had 36 teachers. Samples were randomly selected by stratified random sampling procedure. Experiment was conducted in the second semester of the 2017 academic year, by using the Pretest and Multiple-Posttest Design by measuring in the follow up period. The research instruments were the collective leadership questionnaire, RAI=.819, the teamwork competencies and the satisfaction questionnaires with Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient=.923, and .905 respectively. The statistics were used to analyze data including; mean, standard deviation, repeated measures MANOVA and content analysis. The research findings were as follows:
The experimental group and control group had the average score of collective leadership and teamwork competencies, when measured in different periods of time, significantly differed at a level of .01 (Pillai’s Trace=.560, F = 21.685, df = 4,67 p=.000). Based on groups and time periods, the experimental group had collective leadership and teamwork competencies score statistically significantly differed at the .05 level, on the other hand, the control group was not. The experimental group, satisfied to the teacher collective leadership development model in a very high level (M=4.675, SD=0.345).
Article Details
1) The content of article in HROD journal is the author’s wholly responsibility to research, analyze, summarize, compile, and reference data. The editorial department will not be responsible in anyway.
2) The submitted articles in HROD journal must be unpublished before and must not be currently under consideration for publication elsewhere. If it is detected for its repetition, the author must be responsible for infringement of copyright.
3) Authors will be asked to transfer copyright of the article to the Publisher. The article is prohibited to reproduce all or part of the text, unless allowed.
References
พุฒิศักดิ์ แนวทอง, องอาจ นัยพัฒน์ และอรอุมา เจริญสุข. (2560). การวิเคราะห์องค์ประกอบภาวะผู้นำกลุ่มของครูในโรงเรียนสังกัดกรุงเทพมหานคร. วารสารพฤติกรรมศาสตร์เพื่อการพัฒนา. 9(2), 40-55.
รวิษฎา ถิรวัชรภูวดล, สมบูรณ์ บูรศิริรักษ์ และสมชาย เทพแสง. (2559). ภาวะผู้นำการเปลี่ยนแปลงของผู้บริหารที่ส่งผลต่อการทำงานเป็นทีมของครู สังกัดสำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษามัธยมศึกษา เขต 4. วารสารบริหารการศึกษา มศว, 13(25), 21-32.
สกล วรเจริญศรี. (2559). จิตวิทยาสำหรับการฝึกอบรมและพัฒนาบุคลากรในองค์การ. กรุงเทพฯ: แดเน็กซ์ อินเตอร์คอร์เปอร์เรชั่น.
สมชาติ กิจยรรยง. (2555). เทคนิคการเป็นวิทยากรที่ประสบความสำเร็จ: เคล็ดลับการเป็นสุดยอดวิทยากร. กรุงเทพฯ: เอ็กซเปอร์เน็ท.
Anderson, M. (2011). The struggle for collective leadership: Thinking and practice in a multi-campus school setting. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 40(3), 328–342.
Bass, B. M., & Bass, R. (2008). The bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Bateman, T. S., & Snell, S.A. (2009). Management: Leading and collaborating in the competitive world (8th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin.
Chirichello, M. (2004). Collective leadership: Reinventing the principalship. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 40(3), 119-23.
Chrobot-Mason, D., Gerbasi, A., Cullen-Lester, K. L. (2016). Predicting leadership relationships: The importance of collective identity. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 298–311.
Contractor, N. S., DeChurch, L. A., Carson, J., Carter, D. R., & Keegan, B. (2012). The topology of collective leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 994-1011.
Cullen-Lester, K. L, & Yammarino, F. J. (2016). Collective and network approaches to leadership: Special issue introduction. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 173–180.
Delgado, O. (2014). Improvement areas of leadership training in European institutions of higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4712-4716.
DuBrin, A. J. (2010). The principles of leadership (6th ed.). Toronto: Houghton Mifflin.
Edmonds, W. A., & Kennedy, T. D. (2013). An applied reference guide to research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Kaiser, R. B., Hogan, R., & Craig, S. B. (2008). Leadership and the fate of organizations. American Psychologist, 63(2), 96-110.
Karimi, L., & Ahmad, T. B. (2013). Perceived learning and satisfaction in a blended teacher education program: An experience of Malaysian teacher trainees. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(3), 197-211.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Gonzalez, M. G., Burke, M. J., Santuzzic, A. M., & Bradley, J. C. (2003). The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 648-629.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
Friedrich, T. L., Griffith, J. A., & Mumford, M.D. (2016). Collective leadership behaviors: Evaluating the leader, team network, and problem situation characteristics that influence their use. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(2), 312-333.
Johnson, T., Martin, A. J., Palmer, F. R.., Watson, P. L. (2012). Collective leadership a case study of the all blacks. Asia-Pacific Management and Business Application, 1(1), 53–67.
Hiller, N. J., Day, D. V., & Vance, R. J. (2006). Collective enactment of leadership roles and team effectiveness: A field study. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 387–397.
Lawson, K. (2008). Leadership Development Basics. American Society for Training and Development.
Leithwood, K. A., Louis, K. S., & Anderson, S. E. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mantzaris, E, & Pillay, P. (2015). Ubuntu, collective leadership and ethics: A South African case study. Proceedings of the European Conference on Management, Leadership, 262-269. Kidmore End: Academic Conferences International Limited.
Martin, W. E., & Bridgmon, K. D. (2012). Quantitative and statistical research methods: From hypothesis to results. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
McLeod, J. (2003). An introduction to counselling (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Méndez, María J., Howell, J. P., & Bishop, J. W. (2015). Beyond the unidimensional collective leadership model: Study of leadership patterns in committees. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(6), 675-696.
Militello, M., & Benham, M. K. P. (2010). “Sorting Out” collective leadership: How Q- methodology can be used to evaluate leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 21: 620–632.
Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee training and development (5thed.). New York: McGrawHill.
O’Connell, P. K. (2014). A simplified framework for 21st century leader development. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 183–203.
Ritchie, S. M., Mackay, G., Donnal, L. R. (2006). Individual and collective leadership in school science department. Research in Science Education, 36, 141-161.
Ritchie, S. M., Tobin, K., Rothl, W., & Carambo, C. (2007). Transforming an academy through the enactment of collective curriculum leadership. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(2), 151–175.
Rønning, R., Espedal, B., & Jordahl, A. (2013). An exploration of two perspectives on leadership in globalised contexts. European Journal of International Management, 7(5), 501-516.
Scott, C. P. R., Jiang, H., Wildman, J. L, & Griffith, R. (2016). The impact of implicit collective leadership theories on the emergence and effectiveness of leadership networks in teams. Human Resource Management Review. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.03.005.
Turesky, E. F., & Gallagher, D. (2011). Know thyself: Coaching for leadership using Kolb’s experiential learning theory. The Coaching Psychologist, 7(1), 5–14.
Translated Thai references
Kityunyong, S. (2012). Theknik kan pen witthayako̜n thi prasop khwamsamret [Train the Trainner]. Bangkok: Expernet.
Naewtong, P., Naiyapatana, O., Charoensuk, O. (2017). Kan wikhro̜ ongprako̜p phawa phu nam klum kho̜ng khru nai rongrian sangkat Krung Thep Maha Nakho̜n [A factor analysis of teacher collective leadership in schools under Bangkok metropolitan jurisdiction]. Journal of Behavioral Science for Development, 9(2), 40-55.
Smithikrai, C. (2017). Kan fưk oprom bukkhalako̜n nai ongkan [Personnel training in organizations] (9thed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Thirawatcharaphoowadol, R., Burasirirak, S., Thepsaeng, S. (2016). Phawa phu nam kan plianplæng kho̜ng phubo̜rihan thi song phon to̜ kanthamngan pen thim kho̜ng khru sangkat samnakngan khet phưnthi kansưksa matthayommasưksa khet si [The transformational leadership of school administrators affecting working as a team of teachers under the Secondary Education Service Area Office 4]. SWU Educational Administration Journal, 13(25), 21-32.
Voracharoensri, S. (2016). Chittawitthaya samrap kan fưk oprom læ phatthana bukkhalako̜n nai ongkan [Psychology for personnel training and development in organization]. Bangkok: Danex Intercorporation.