The Indigenous Youth Engagement in Environmental Sustainability: Native Americans in Coconino County A Case Study of Native Americans in Coconino County, USA

Main Article Content

Sudarat Tuntivivat Siti Fatimah Jafar Cynthia Seelhammer Jeffery Carlson

Abstract

Engaging young people in environmental sustainability is a promising approach for fostering positive development among youth and communities. The purpose of this research was to examine the impact of Native American youth engagement in environmental sustainability in Coconino County. This qualitative case study focused on how a social cognitive theory influences Native American youth engagement in environmental sustainability. The results found that personal (values and attitudes), behavioral (learnings and lifestyles), and environmental (green space and environment stewardship) were the underlying themes associated with engagement of Native American youth in environmental sustainability in Coconino County which has a relatively large Native American population. In turn, the Native American youth who were given early exposure to place-based and environmental education had a positive impact on environmental sustainability in their community. This paper offered some psychosocial and behavioral science implications as well as recommended further investigation on indigenous youth engagement in social and environmental soundness.

Keywords

Article Details

How to Cite
Tuntivivat, S., Jafar, S., Seelhammer, C., & Carlson, J. (2018). The Indigenous Youth Engagement in Environmental Sustainability: Native Americans in Coconino County. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 13(2), 81-93. Retrieved from https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/106174
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

Sudarat Tuntivivat, Behavioral Science Research Institute

Behavioral Science Research Institute

References

Asian Development Bank (2010). Policy Indigenous Peoples. Retrieved May 25, 2017 from https://www.adb.org/documents/policy-indigenous-peoples
Bandura A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Balis, T., & Postolache, T. T. (2008). Ethnic Differences in Adolescent Suicide in the United States. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development : IJCHD, 1(3), 281–296.
Basiago, A. D. (1999). Economic, Social, and Environmental sustainability in Development Theory and Urban Planning Practice. The Environmentalist 19, 145-161.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological Models of Human Development. In International Encyclopedia of Education, Vol 3, 2 nd. Ed. Oxford: Elsevier. Reprinted in: Gauvain, M. & Cole, M. (Eds.), Readings on the Development of Children, 2 nd Ed. (1993, pp. 37-43). NY: Freeman.
Browne, Laurie P., Garst, Barry A., Bialeschki, M. Deborah. (2011). Engaging Youth in Environmental Sustainability: Impact of the Camp 2 Grow Program. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 29 (3): 70-85.
Bureau of Indian Affairs (2014). Retrieved May 15, 2017 from
https://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/biaind.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coconino County Administration Office (2017). History of Coconino. Coconino, AZ. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from https://www.coconino.az.gov/427/History-of-Coconino
Evans, S. D., & Prilleltensky, I. (2007). Youth and democracy: Participation for personal, relational, and collective well-being. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 681-692.
Gary FA, Baker M, Grandbois DM. (2005). Perspectives on suicide prevention among American Indian and Alaska native children and adolescents: a call for help. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing.10(2):6.
Garroutte EM, Goldberg J, Beals J, Herrell R, Manson SM. (2003). Spirituality and attempted suicide among American Indians. Social Science Medicine. 56(7):1571–9.
Hart, D., & Atkins, R. (2002). Civic competence in urban youth. Applied DevelopmentalScience, 6(4), 227-236.
Haynie, Dana L., Eric Silver, and Brent Teasdale. 2006. “Neighborhood Characteristics, PeerNetworks and Adolescent Violence.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(2): 147-169.
Johnson, L. R., Johnson-Pynn, J. S., Sweeney, S. S., & Williams, C. T. (2009). Youth civic action: Going green, going global. Ecopsychology, 1(2), 75-84.
Kahn, M. (1995). Concepts, definitions, and key issues in sustainable development: the outlook for the future. Proceedings of the 1995 International Sustainable Development Research Conference, Manchester, England, Mar. 27-28, 1995, Keynote Paper, 2-13.
Knoester, Chris and Dana L. Haynie. (2005).Community Context, Social Integration into Family,and Youth Violence.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 767-80.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7): 262-273.
Meinhold JI, Malkus AJ. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors. Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and Behavior. 37: 511-532.
Navajo Nation Government (2017). Retrieved May 15, 2017 from https://www.navajo-nsn.gov/
Rushing, Hildebrandt, Grimes, Rowsell, Christensen, & Lambert. (2017). Healthy & Empowered Youth: A Positive Youth Development Program for Native Youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(3), S263-S267.
Schusler, T. M., & Krasny, M. E. (2010). Environmental action as a context for youth development. Journal of Environmental Education, 41 (4), 208-223.
Shochet, I. A., Dadds, M. R., Ham, D., & Montague, R. (2006). School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35(2), 170-179.
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Tabernero C, Hernandez, B. (2010). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Environment and Behavior, 43, 658-675.
United Nations (2002). Indigenous Peoples. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from
https://undesadspd.org/indigenouspeoples.aspx
Volk, T. L., & Cheak, M. J. (2003). The effects of an environmental education program on students, parents, and community. Journal of Environmental Education, 34(4), 12-25.
Witherspoon, D., Schotland, M., Way, N., & Hughes, D. (2009). Connecting the dots: How connectedness to multiple contexts influences the psychological and academic adjustment of urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 13(4), 199-216.
Wood RE, Bandura A. (1989) Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 56: 407-415.
World Bank (1986). Environmental Aspects of Bank Work. The World Bank Operations Manual Statements, OMS 2.36. Washington, DC: World Bank
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol20/ iss2/12
Yohalem, N., & Martin, S. (2007). Building the evidence base for youth engagement: Reflections on youth & democracy. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 807-810.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Doing case study research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: