Main Article Content
The purpose of the recent study was to compare rhetorical moves and move sequences in scientific research articles published by standard and predatory journals. The corpus consisted of 100 research abstracts (50 standard and 50 predatory abstracts) published between 2011 and 2015. The abstracts were analyzed based on Santos’s (1996) move model consisting of five main moves: ‘Situating the research’, ‘Presenting the research’, ‘Describing the methodology’, ‘Summarizing the results’, and ‘Discussing the research’. To increase the reliability of the analysis, three inter-raters were invited to verify the data. The findings show five moves in two corpora. All moves in the standard corpus occurred more than 60% of the time and are considered as conventional moves. However, four moves in the predatory journal abstracts [Move 3 or ‘Describing the methodology’ (94%), Move 4 or ‘Summarizing the results’ (82%), Move 2 or ‘Presenting the research’ (68%), and Move 5 or ‘Discussing the research’ (64%)] occurred as conventional moves; Move 1, or ‘Situating the research’,which occurred in only 48% of cases, was an exception. In addition, 50 abstracts in the standard corpus exhibited 26 move sequences; on the contrary, in the predatory corpus of 50 abstracts, 41 move sequenceswere found. The findings reveal that moves and move sequences of predatory abstracts are varied and do not conform to those found instandard journals. Thus, it can be concluded that move analysis may be used to distinguish between standard (peer-reviewed) journals and predatory (non-peer-reviewed) journals.
Keywords: Move analysis, research abstract, scientific research
article, predatory journals
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).