Strategies of Creative Literature Review for New Researchers

Main Article Content

Wilai Phungphol Prasopchai Pasunon

Abstract

An important literature review is the systematic organization of issues related to the objectives of the research that needs to be synthesized in order to create a new research. The new researchers have to look for theories that had empirical results related to an ongoing research from the reliable sources and get published from quality journals. The objectives of the academic article were aimed to propose ten creative literature review strategies which related to the research process and guideline on a fast and effective search for theories to new researchers. Before the literature review, two principles need to be studied which were: 1) the value and importance of the literature review and; 2) the main goals of a creative literature review. When starting to review literature, the following 8 major strategies are applied: 1) Set up research methodology in accordance with the strategies; 2) Strategically review the literature that is most related to the research; 3) Use reviewed literature in the research methodology; 4) Principles of creative writing  the research report by using the literature review; 5) Precautions of possibly frequent mistakes that suggesting the use of 5 practices and 1 prohibition strategy offerings; 6) The appropriate form of writing the literature review; 7) The principles of the creative synthesis in a quantitative research for new researchers; and 8) Effective library access.


          New researchers can apply the strategies of this academic article to add value to their research with confidence on creating academic articles in order to have their research published with recognition to become a professional academician.

Keywords

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

กวินธร เสถียร. (2552). แนวทางการทบทวนวรรณกรรมสำหรับการเขียนวิทยานิพนธ์ด้านสังคมศาสตร์: สภาพปัญหาและหลักการทบทวนวรรณกรรม (รับทุนสนับสนุนการวิจัยงบประมาณรายได้ของคณะสังคมศาสตร์ ปีงบประมาณ 2552). พิษณุโลก: มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร.

นรินทร์ สังข์รักษา. กลยุทธ์การวิจัยอย่างมีคุณภาพ. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 4, นครปฐม: โรงพิมพ์มหาวิทยาลัยศิลปากร.

ประสพชัย พสุนนท์. (2558). การประเมินความเชื่อมั่นระหว่างผู้ประเมินโดยใช้สถิติแคปปา. วารสารวิชาการศิลปศาสตร์ประยุกต์, 8(1): 2-20.

ปรีชา อุปโยคิน.(2554). รายงานการวิจัย สไลด์การสอน. มหาวิทยาลัยแม่ฟ้าหลวง ห้อง ๓๐๖ อาคาร D1.
รุจเรขา วิทยาวุฑฒิกุล .(2556). รู้ทันวารสารวิชาการ และภัยเงียบ Open Access กับการสืบค้น. สไลด์โครงการส่งเสริมและพัฒนาคุณภาพผลงานทางวิชาการสำหรับอาจารย์และนิสิตบัณฑิตศึกษา มหาวิทยาลัยพะเยา.

วรางคณา จันทร์คง. (2555). จรรยาบรรณนักวิจัย:แนวทางปฏิบัติ. จุลสารสาขาวิชาวิทยาศาสตร์สุขภาพ มหาวิทยาลัยสุโขทัยธรรมาธิราช.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการวิจัยแห่งชาติ. (2555). จรรยาวิชาชีพและแนวทางปฎิบัติ. พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 2, กรุงเทพฯ:โรงพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Ajayi, O.V. (2017). Distinguish between primary sources of data and secondary sources of data. ResearchGate Journal, 1-5.

Armstrong, J. S. (1988). Research needs in forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting, 4(3): 449-465.

Australian Bureau of Statistics.(2006). 4610.0-Water account, Australia, 2004-05. Retrieved September 5, 2016, from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4610.0Main+Features12004-05.

Baron, A. R., & Tang, J. (2016). Entrepreneurs’ Social Skills and New Venture Performance: Mediating Mechanisms and Cultural Generality. Journal of Management OnlineFirst, 1-25.

Boote, D. N., & Beile, P. (2005). Scholars before researchers: On the centrality of the dissertation literature review in research preparation. SAGE Journals, 34(6): 3-15.

Boyden, E. S. (2007). Managing brain resources in an age of complexity. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved September 17, 2016, from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/409043/how-to-think/.

Cohen, J.(1992). Quantitative Methods in Psychology: A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1):155-159.

Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews.Netherlands: Springer. Retrieved September 12, 2016, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF03177550?LI=true.

Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications.
Gore, S.M, Jones, I.G., Rytter, E.C. (1976); Yim, Nahm, Ah Han & Park. (2010). Misuse of statistical methods: critical assessment of articles in BMJ from January to March 1976. British Medical Journal, 1:85–87.

Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction (6th ed.). New York: Longman.

Gash, S. (2000). Effective literature searching for research. England: Gower Publishing.

Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. London: SAGE Publications.

Huang, L., & Pearce, J. L. (2015). Managing the Unknowable: The Effectiveness of Early-stage Investor Gut Feel in Entrepreneurial Investment Decisions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(4): 634-670.

Keeves, P.J. (1988). Educational research, and methodology, and measurement. An International handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Krejcie, R. V., and Morgan, D.W.(1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30:607-610.

National Council on Research and Innovation Policy. (2017). National Council on Research and Innovation Policy Approved 20 years research and Innovation Strategy. Retrieved September 28, 2016, from Website http://www.nric.go.th/nric-news/สภานโยบายวิจัยและนวัตกรรมแห่งชาติ-เห็นชอบร่างยุทธศาสตร์การวิจัยและนวัตกรรม-20-ปี.

Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R.D. (1988). Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies. California: SagePublishing.

Ogle, D.M. (1986). K-W-L: A teaching model that develops active reading of expository text. The Reading Teacher, 39(6): 564-570.

Reed, S. G. (2016). A Library Board’s Practical Guide to Strategic Planning. Pennsylvania: United for Libraries.

Robinson, F. P. (1961). Effective study (4th edtion). New York: Harper.

Randolph, J. (2009). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review , Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation. A Peer-Review Electromic Journal, 14 (13):1-13.

Slavin, R.E.(1986). Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. SAGE Journals, 15(9): 5-11.

Sullivan, J. (2011). Strategies of Synthesis writing. Retrieved September 18, 2016, from http://www.findingdulcinea.com/features/edu/Strategies-for-Synthesis-Writing.html.

Tinkler, P.,& Jackson,C. (2004). The doctoral examination process: a handbook for students, examiners and supervisors. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
The university of Sydney. (2018). Literature reviews. Retrieved September 2, 2018, from https://sydney.edu.au/students/research-skills-for-higher-degree-by-research-students/literature-reviews.html.

Tsai, K. C. (2012). Play, Imagination, and Creativity: A Brief Literature Review. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2): 15-20.

The Senate Appeals Committee. (2017). Academic regulation I-14 - Academic fraud, Administration and Governance, Ottawa University.

Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzng the past to prepare for the future: Writing a Literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2): 13-23.

Wisitpongphan, N. (n.d.). Literature Review. Retrieved September 23, 2016, from http://www2.it.kmutnb.ac.th/teacher/FileDL/AsstProfDrNawaporn152256011215.pdf.

Wissawapaisal, B., & Lerdmanee, S. (2015). SIU Thesis / Research Publication Manual: A Handbook of Requirements for Format and Arrangement (International Program). Pathum Thani:Shinawatra University.Retrieved September 8, 2016, from http://library.siu.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/SIU-Thesis-and-Research-Publication-Format-Requirements-International-Program.pdf.

Yamane, T. (1973 ). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. 3rd edition, N.Y.: Harper and Row Publications.

Yim, K., Nahm, S.F., Ah Han, K. & Park, Y.S. (2010). Analysis of Statistical Methods and Errors in the Articles. The Korean Journal of Pain. 23(1): 35–41.

Zeldin, W. (2016). Thailand: Digital Ministry Established as Part of National Digital Economy Plan. Retrieved September 10, 2016, from http://www.loc.gov/law/foreign-news/article/thailand-digital-ministry-established-as-part-of-national-digital-economy-plan/.


Satean, Kawinthorn. (2009). Literature Review Guidelines for Social Sciences Thesis Writing: Problem and Principle of Literature Review. Faculty of Social Science, Nareasuan University. (In Thai)

Sungrugsa, Narin. (2016). Research strategy : Weaknesses and Shortcomings of the research, 4th edition. Nakhon Pathom: Silpakorn University Printing House. (In Thai)

Pasunon, Prasopchai. (2015). Evaluation of Inter-Rater Reliability Using Kappa Statistics. The Journal of Faculty of Applied Arts, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 8(1): 2-20. (In Thai)

Upayokin, Preecha .(2011). Research Report Slides for Teaching. Mae Fah Luang University Lecture Room No. 306, D1 Building.

Witayawutikul, Rujiraekha. (2013). Academic Journal and Silent Open Access with Queries. The encouragement and Development Quality Academic Program for teachers and graduate students at Phayao University, Slides. (In Thai)

Chankong, Warangkana. (2012). Code of Ethics for Researcher:Guideline. Booklet of Health Science, Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. 3:1. (In Thai)

National Research Council of Thailand. (2012). Code of Ethics for Researcher and Guideline. 2nd edition, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House. (In Thai)