Psychometric Properties Test of the Dempster Practice Behaviors Scale: Thai version

Main Article Content

ชนัญชิดาดุษฎี ทูลศิริ พัชรินทร์ พูลทวี

Abstract

Abstract


            The purpose of this study is to examine Thai Dempster Practice Behaviors Scale [DPBS]. A blind back translation method is employed by the researchers and experts. Psychometric analysis was used that included reliability and exploratory factor analysis. A random sampling method was used to recruit 311 nurse practitioners in Eastern region. Data collection was by demographic record form and a self-administered DPBS questionnaire. Data was analyzed by percentage, Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and factor analysis.


          The results of the study revealed that the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the Thai version of the DPBS of nurse practitioners was .89 and factor analysis showed 7 factors of structure was an appropriate structure. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of each factor was .81, .76, .70, .68, .65, .73, and .60 respectively. The findings suggest that nurses and healthcare personnel can use this scale to evaluate the practice behaviors of nurse practitioners as a means for finding ways to scope the role of nurse practitioners

Keywords

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

Reference

Benner, P. (1982). Issues in competency-based testing. Nursing Outlook, 30(5), 303-309.

Cha, E., Kim, K., & Erlen, J. (2007). Translation of scales in cross cultural research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Advance Nursing, 58(4), 386-395.

Chưngsathiansap, K., & Kata, P. (2007). Primary health care, Primary care service: From
philosophy to new dimensions health practice. Nonthaburi: Society and Health
Institute. [In Thai]


Daly, W. M., & Carnwell, R. (2003). Nursing roles and levels of practice: A framework
for differentiating between elementary, specialist, and advanced practice.
Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12, 158-167.

Dempster, J. S. (1990). Autonomy in practice: Conceptualization, construction, and
psychometric evaluation of an empirical instrument. Dissertation Abstract
International, 50, 3320A. (UMI No. 9030752).

Dempster, J. S. (1994). Autonomy: A professional issue of concern for nurse practitioners.
Nurse Practitioner Forum, 5(4), 227-232.

Furlong, E., & Smith, R. (2005). Advanced nursing practice: Policy, education, and role
development. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14, 1059–1066.

Gould, O. N., Johnstone, O. & Wasylkiw, L. (2007). Nurse practitioners in Canada: Beginnings,
benefits, and barriers. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners.
19(2007), 165–171

Government of Ireland. (2003). The challenge for nursing and midwifery. Dublin:
Department of Health & Children Government Publications.

Hanujarernkul, S. (2008). Nurse practitioner and primary care development. The Thai Journal
of Primary Care and Family Medicine, 1(1), 39-42. [In Thai]

Junprasert, S. (2007). Nurse practitioner: Unity, identity, autonomy. The Journal of Faculty of
Nursing Burapha University, 15(4), 1-5. [In Thai]

Kompayak, J. (2011). Community health nursing in health system. In Kompayak, J., &
Durongritichai, V. (Eds.). Community health nursing: Concept, principles, and nursing
practice (2nd ed., pp. 1-68). Bangkok: Judthong. [In Thai]

Nagelsmith, L. (1995) Competence: An evolving concept. The Journal of Continuing
Education in Nursing, 26(6), 245–248.

Newhouse, R. P., Stanik-Hutt, J., White, K. M., Johantgen, M., Bass, E. B., Zangaro, G.,
Wilson, R. F., Fountain, L., Steinwachs, D. M., Heindel, L., & Weiner, J. P. (2011).
Advanced practice nurse outcomes 1990-2008: A systematic review.
Nursing Economics, 29(5), 230-251.

Offredy, M., & Townsend, J. (2000). Nurse practitioners in primary care. Family Practice, 17(6),
564-569.

Tabachnick , B. G, & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson
Education

Temmink, D., Francke, A. L., Hutten, J. B. F., van der Zee, J., & Abu-Saad, H. H. (2000).
Innovations in the nursing care of the chronically ill: A literature review from
an international perspective. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31, 1449.

Ulrich, C. M., & Soeken, K. L. (2005). A path analytic model of ethical conflict in practice
and autonomy in a sample of nurse practitioners. Nursing Ethics, 12, 305–316.


Vanichbuncha, K. (2005). Advanced statistics analysis by SPSS for Windows. (4th ed.).
Bangkok: Dharmasarn Printing. [In Thai]

Weiland, S. A. (2015). Understanding nurse practitioner autonomy. Journal of the American
Association of Nurse Practitioners. 27(2), 95-104.

While, A. E. (1994). Competence versus performance: Which is more important?.
Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20, 525–531.

Wibulpolprasert, S. (2007). Thailand health profile 2005-2007. Bangkok: Printing Press, The War
Veterans Organization of Thailand. [In Thai]