Main Article Content
An evaluation research project 3 million 3 years of the project quit for King in Health region 10. The theoretical framework used in this study was based on the concept of RE-AIM. The sample consisted 2 groups 1) 376 service users are community dwellers and 13 informants 2) 385 health care providers included village health volunteer, public health nurse officer, public health officer, district health office, province health office and 29 informants. Data were collected by questionnaire, indept-interview, non-participant observation. The instruments used in this study consisted of a questionnaire of project evaluation for service user, and a questionnaire of project evaluation for health care provider. The two latter questionnaires were tested for their reliabilities which equaled 0.98 and 0.95 respectively. The data were collected between October and December, 2017, and analyzed through descriptive statistics and content analysis. The results are as follows:
- Most of service users (80.30) were male, with mean age of 48.21±14.19 The results in every aspect was a high level. The study also revealed that the highest mean was reach (3.90±1.19), effectiveness (3.83±1.22), implementation (3.76±1.00), adoption (3.65±1.31), and maintenance (3.62±1.10) respectively.
- Most of health care provider (66.23) were female, with mean age of 45.94±9.63 The results in every aspect was a high level. The study also revealed that the highest mean was reach (3.87±0.80), effectiveness (3.74±0.88), implementation (3.71±0.91), adoption (3.68±0.92), and maintenance (3.65±1.00) respectively.
Recommendations should maintenance promoting and follow up the project. Village health volunteer, should join a training course, standardized cessation techniques support and to develop up-to-date education media. Facilitating autonomous motivation and stimulation family support and social support for smoking cessation.
บทความ ข้อมูล เนื้อหา รูปภาพ ฯลฯ ที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในรามาธิบดีพยาบาลสาร ถือเป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสาร หากบุคคลหรือหน่วยงานใดต้องการนำทั้งหมดหรือส่วนหนึ่งส่วนใดไปเผยแพร่หรือเพื่อกระทำการใด ใด จะต้องได้รับอนุญาตเป็นลายลักษณ์อักษรจากรามาธิบดีพยาบาลสารก่อนเท่านั้น
2. Pitayarangsarit S, Pankrajang P, Sritabuttra D. 25 years of smoke control in Thailand (1992-2017). Bangkok: Charoendi Monkhong; 2017. (in Thai)
3. American Cancer Society. Tobacco-related cancers fact sheet; 2014. [cited 2016 March 5]. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/tobaccocancer/tobacco-related-cancer-fact-sheet
4. Sewram V, Sitas F, Dianne O, Connell, Myers J. Tobacco and alcohol as risk factors for esophageal cancer in a high incidence area in South Africa. Cancer Epidemiology 2016;41:113-21.
5. Pitayarangsarit S, Iamanan P, Punkrajang P, Sommit K. Tobacco situation 2012. Bangkok: Jarerndee Monkong Karnpim; 2012. (in Thai)
6. Yamsri W, Maneesriwongul W, Panpakdee O. The effect of motivational interviewing on smoking behavior in persons at risk for coronary artery disease. Journal of Public Health Nursing. 2013;41-57(3). (in Thai)
7. Srimoragot P, Sanamthong P, Chainun J, Hong-thong Y, Sawangdee P, Auckarawacharangkul O. Effectiveness of nurse managed tobacco cessation program in Thailand. Thai Journal of Nursing. 2013;62(1):32-43. (in Thai)
8. Meejang S. Education project evaluation: theory and practice. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House; 2015. (in Thai)
9. Donabedian A. An introduction to quality in health care. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
10. Stephanie Jilcott S, Ammerman A, Sommers J, Glasgow R D. Applying the RE-AIM framework to assess the public health impact of policy change. Ann Behav Med. 2007;34(2):105-14.
11. Jampaklay A, Siriratsami B, Siriratsami T, Kenrot P, Pornwiwatnachai S, Pornwiwattanachai S, Konkaew T. International tobacco control policy evaluation project Southeast Asia Survey [Thailand], wave 3 (2008) on among smoker. Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University; 2010. (in Thai)
12. Jampaklay A, Siriratsami B, Holumyong C, Siriratsami T, Konkaew T, Kenrot P. International tobacco control policy evaluation project Southeast Asia Survey [Thailand], wave 5 (2010) on among smoker. Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University; 2013. (in Thai)
13. Siriratsami T Siriratsami B, Holumyong C, Jampaklay A, Kenrot P, Konkaew T. International tobacco control policy evaluation project Southeast Asia Survey [Thailand], wave 6 (2012) on adolescents. Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University; 2013. (in Thai)
14. Taro Y. Statistics: an introductory analysis. 3rded. New York: Harper and Row Publication; 1973.
15. Chirawatkul S. Qualitative research in health science. Bangkok: Wittayaphat; 2009. (in Thai)
16. Saejong P. Behavior, conditions and impact of persons able and unable to give up smoking in Patong Village, Hat Yai District, Songkhla Province. [Master Thesis], Songkhla: Prince of Songkhla University; 2009 (in Thai)
17. Baddouna R, Wehdeh-Chidiac C. Prevalence of tobacco use among the adult Lenanese population. East Mediterrn Health J. 2001;7(4/5):819-28.
18. Junmool B, Pornchaikate Au Yeong A, Yuttatri P. Brief intervention for smoking reduction or cessation in adults: evidence-based nursing. Journal of Public Health Nursing. 2013;27(1):61-73. (in Thai)
19. Taksinachanekij S. Rate of nicotine addiction and cigarette smoking behavior of people enrolled in the program of “reduce, abstain, and give up cigarettes for Queen,s 72nd Birthday, in Khon Kaen. KKU Research Journal. 2007;12(2):173-82. (in Thai)
20. Phetphum C, Nimpitukpong P. A literature review of measures to limit the access to tobacco by youths. J Public health. 2015;45(3):310-23. (in Thai)
21. Jewpattanakul Y, Petchroung N. Youth’s smoking preventions: family’s view. Journal of Faculty of Nursing Burapha University. 2016;24(2):42-50. (in Thai)
22. Sumalee H, Pitayarangsarit S, Iamanan P, Tangcharoensathien V. Assessment of smoking cessation service in public health-affiliated hospitals. Journal of Health System Research. 2015;9(3):241-52. (in Thai)