The Implications of the Existing International Environmental Regulatory Regimes of Access to and Benefit Sharing of Plant Genetic Resources

Main Article Content

Worapoj Suebprasertkul

Abstract

 


The implications of the regulatory regimes of access to and benefit sharing (“ABS”) of plant genetic resources (“PGRs”) under international legal instruments (“ILIs”) made on biodiversity are principally due to the mechanisms equipped with the regimes. Commencing with the aim of regulating PGRs, such mechanisms rely on intellectual property rights (“IPRs”) with the understanding that IPRs can solve the problem regarding ABS of PGRs. Paradoxically, it is such mechanisms that barricade equal access to PGRs and prevent the benefits from being fairly shared, rendering PGRs in the exclusive and negative area in the common space, eventually degrading biodiversity.


The evaluation of the ILIs demonstrates the tendency towards expanding the coverage of legally entitled actors and access channels to PGRs whilst retaining the measures of intellectual property law (“IPL”). Such tendency, nevertheless, supports IPRs to the extent that the regimes are stringent in allowing equal and fair ABS of PGRs to take place. Furthermore, the up-to-date measures cannot uplift the barrier based on state sovereignty. This dose not mean that IPL is unpleasant itself, rather, it pinpoints us to that if IPL as a legal measure in regulating PGRs is detrimental to the environment, we must rebuild a regulatory regime in the manner that simultaneously sustains biodiversity. The proposed approach may be based on some other means like the bank of PGRs where states parties are entitled to access them whereas benefits in the form of access entitlements can be traded – potentially taken as legal incentives and mechanisms to replace IPRs.


Keywords: Access to and Benefit Sharing of Plant Genetic Resources, International Environmental Law, Biodiversity, Environment

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Books

A. Kiss and D. Shelton, International Environmental Law, 1999.
Anthony Aust, Modern Treaty Law and Practice, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007.
Christian Brutsch and Dirk Lehmkuhl, Law and Legalization in
Transnational Relations, Routledge, UK, 2007.
Daniel Bodansky, The Art and Craft of International Environmental Law,
Harvard University Press, Massachusetts, US and London, England,
2010.
E. Brown-Weiss, In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law,
Common Patrimony, Intergenerational Equity, 1989.
Edith Brown Weiss, International Environmental Law: Contemporary
Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order, Geo. LJ.
G. Yyler Miller and Scott Spoolman, Environmental Science, Thomson, USA, 2006.
G. Tyler Miller, Jr. and Scott Spoolman, Environmental Science,
Problems, Concepts, and Solutions, Thomson, Canada, 2008.
Gerhard Loibl, International Environmental Regulations, in International
Law Between Universalism and Fragmentation: Festschrift in
Honour of Gerhard Hafner (Isabelle Buffard et al. ends., 2008).
Grieco, J. M., Cooperation Among Nations: Europe, America, and Non
Tariff Barriers to Trade, Ithaca,: Cornell University Press, 1990.
John Spicer, Biodiversity, Oneworld Publications, England, 2012.
Jonathan Slack, Genes, A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University
Press, UK, 2014.
Kevin J. Gaston, John I Spicer, Biodiversity, An Introduction,
Blackwell’s Publishing, UK, 2004.
Louis Henkin, How Nations Behave, Columbia University Press, New
York, 1979.
Malgosia Fitzmaurice and Olufemi Elias, Contemporary Issues in Law of
Treaties, Eleven International Publishing, the Netherlands, 2005.
N. Onuf, World of our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and
International Relations, Columbia, University of South California Press,
1989.
P. Birnie and A. Boyle, International Law and the Environment, 2002.
Philippe Sands and Jacqueline Peel, Principles of International
Environmental Law, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2015.
R.D. Munro and J.G. Lammers, Environmental Protection and
Sustainable Development: Legal Principles and Recommendations,
1986.
Rebecca Wallace and Anne Holiday, International Law in a Nutshell,
Sweet & Maxwell, London, UK, 2006.
Richard L. Revesz, Foundations of Environmental Law and Policy,
Foundation Press, New York, 1997.
Robert Elliot, Environmental Ethics, Oxford University Press, Oxford,
UK, 1995.
Roger Scrutton, Green Philosophy, Atlantic Books, Great Britain, 2013.
Sahotra Sarkar, Biodiversity and Environmental Philosophy An
Introduction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005.
The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law, Oxford
University Press, 2007.
Tim Dunne, International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity,
Oxford University, Great Britain, 2013.
Wolfrum and Matz, Conflicts in International Environmental Law, 2003.

Journal Articles

Comparative Environmental Law 43, 2007.
Environmental Policy and Law, 37/2-3, IOS Press, 2007.
Environmental Policy and Law, 37/4, IOS Press, 2007.
European Environment 16, published online in Wiley InterScience,
2006.
European Journal of International Relations, 19/3.
Global Environmental Politics 4:3, MIT Press, August 2004.
Global Environmental Politics 6:1, MIT Press, February 2006.
Global Environmental Politics 6:4, MIT Press, November 2006.
Global Environmental Politics 14:2, MIT Press, May 2014.
Global Environmental Politics 15:2, MIT Press, May 2015.
Himalayan Journal of Sciences, Vol 3, Issue 5, Jan-June 2005.
International Affairs, 49(4), 1973, 600 at 607.
International Environemntal Agreements: Politics, Law & Economics,
11:99-116, 2011.
International Organization, Volume 47, 1993.
International Organization, Volume 41, Issue 3, 1987.
International Organization, Volume 54/1, 2000.
Issues in Science and Technology, Fall, University of Texas and Dallas,
USA, 2008.
Journal of International Affairs, 46, No.2, The Trustees of Columbia
University in the City of New York, Winter 1993.
Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 2002.
Journal of Law and Economics, 43(1), 2000.
Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental
Law, MqJlICEnvLaw 3; (2007) 4(1).
Mizan Law Review, Volume 7, No.2, December 2013.
New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, Volume
44:1205, New York, University School of Law, New York, USA,
2012.
Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Volume 28, Issue 1, 2012.
Science, 162(3859), 1968.
Science, 280(5364), 1998.
Science, 306(5700), 2004.
The Columbia Journal of World Business, Fall & Winter, USA, 1992.
The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol.10, Nos. 3/4, Blackwell
Publishing Limited, 2007.
The Journal of World Intellectual Property, Vol. 11, No.3, Blackwell
Publishing Limited, 2008.
UCLA Law Review, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 837, 2008.
UCLA Law Review, 63 UCLA L. Rev. 264, 2016.
Virginia Environmental Law Journal, Volume 33:102, 2015.
Virginia Law Review, Volume 101, No.4, University of Virginia, School
of Law, USA, June 2015.
Yale Law Journal 106, 1997.
4 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 2000.
18 Yale Journal of International Law, 451, 1993.
30 Colum. J. Envtl. L. I, 9, 2005.
84 American Journal of International Law, 1990.