Main Article Content
The research findings are as follows; 1) the suitability and the usability of the System and mechanism for assessing the quality of Management of the Thai Senate Standing Committee in overall were at high level; 2) The problems revealed concern the fact that only few senators participated in the quality planning; therefore, others had not been convinced of the assessment system, not to mention that there is no planning revision method. In this aspect, the external quality assurance committees should be called for to ensure the objectivity of the assessment process. The committees may vary from various organizations; 3) An evaluation of the effectiveness of the criteria for Internal Quality Assurance of the Thai Senate Standing Committee reveals four main key components namely; 3.1) Strategic plan 3.2) Scrutinizing the laws 3.3) controlling the Government Administration, and 3.4) administration and management. There were 20 indicators and 165 items of standard criteria. After testing, it was found that the criteria for effectiveness demonstrated high discriminant validity feasibility.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The manuscript submitted for publication must be the original version, submitted only to this particular journal with no prior acceptance for publication elsewhere in other academic journals. The manuscript must also not violate the copyright issue by means of plagiarism.