Main Article Content
Empathy and systemising skill are very important for strengthening pro-social behaviour. However, the EQ-C/SQ-C questionnaire was originally framed in the English language and has not been translated into the Indonesian language. Therefore, this study aims at validating and to analysing the reliability of the EQ-C/ SQ-C in the Indonesian version. The study used a cross-sectional design that included 752 primary school students and their parents .They were selected randomly in accordance with their willingness to participate in the study. The parents were asked to fill the EQ-C/SQ-C questionnaire. The educational background of the parents was at least secondary high school. The analysis included content and construct validity, internal consistency reliability test. All analyses were run on SPSS for Mac version 21. The age of children ranged between 4–14 years, with mean (SD) being 10.07 (0.07). The educational background of parents was mostly above the high school degree. The content validity analysis showed that four statements of the EQ-C/ SQ-C Indonesian version were not validated by the experts’ judgment; therefore, they were deleted. The construct validation done after deleting 7 items of EQ-C and 6 items of SQ-C, the requirement for principle
component analysis was accomplished. Principal component analysis of EQ-C/SQ-C items extracted three components with eigenvalue >1. These two components justified 64.39% of the total EQ-C/SQ-C variance. Internal consistency was good with Cronbach’s alpha 0.979. EQ-C/SQ-C Indonesian version had a shorter version with 38 items. It was a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure the empathy and systemizing skills among Indonesian children.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
The authors retain copyright and permit the journal the copyright of first publication
Aravamudhan, N. R., & Krishnaveni, R. (2015). Establishing and reporting content validity evidence of training and development capacity building scale (TDCBS). Management: journal of contemporary management issues, 20(1), 131-158.
Auyeung, B., Wheelwright, S., Allison, C., Atkinson, M., Samarawickrema, N., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). The Children’s Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient:Sex Differences in Typical Development and in Autism Spectrum Conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(11), 1509-1521
Azwar S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 248-254.
Bujang, M. A., & Baharum, N. (2017). A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: a review. Archives of Orofacial Science, 12(1). 1 – 11.
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current directions in psychological science, 15(2), 54-58.
Feldman, R. (2007). Mother-infant synchrony and the development of moral orientation in childhood and adolescence: direct and indirect mechanisms of developmental continuity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 77(4), 582.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. 3rd ed. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd.
Gallese, V., Rochat, M., Cossu, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2009). Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of action understanding. Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 103-113.
Garner, P. W. (2003). Child and family correlates of toddlers' emotional and behavioral responses to a mishap. Infant Mental Health Journal, 24(6), 580-596.
Groen, Y. W., Fuermaier, A. B., Den Heijer, A. E., Tucha, O., & Althaus, M. (2015). The Empathy and Systemizing Quotient: The Psychometric Properties of the Dutch Version and a Review of the Cross-Cultural Stability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2848-2864.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition, Always Learning. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
Hellsten, L. M. (2008, March). Accumulating content validity evidence: Assessing expert panel ratings of item relevance and representativeness. In National Council on Measurement in Education Annual Conference, New York.
Iacoboni, M., Dapretto, M. (2006). The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(1), 942-951
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the Novel. Oxford University Press on Demand.
Knafo, A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Van Hulle, C., Robinson, J. L., & Rhee, S. H. (2008). The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 8(6), 737-752.
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155-163.
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantification Of Content Validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386.
Martin, G. B., & Clark, R. D. (1982). Distress crying in neonates: Species and peer specificity. Developmental Psychology, 18(1), 3-9.
McDonald, N. M., & Messinger, D. S. (2011). In A. Acerbi, JA Lombo, & JJ Sanguineti (Eds), Free will, Emotions, and Moral Actions: Philosophy and Neuroscience in Dialogue. IF-Press. In press.
Pedersen, R. (2007). Empathy: A wolf in sheep’s clothing? Medicine Health Care and Philosophy, 11(1), 325-335.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497.
Preston, S. D., & De Waal, F. B. (2001). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(01),1-72.
Pusponegoro, H. D., Wirya, I. G. N. W., Pudjiadi, A. H., Bisanto, J., & Zulkarnain, S. Z. (2002). Uji diagnostik. Dasar-dasar metodologi penelitian klinis. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Sagung Seto, 166-84.
Rogers, W. T. (2010): Educational Psychology 507: The Nature of Validity. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Alberta