Influence of Administrator Characteristics and Management Behaviors on the Administrative Effectiveness of Local Government Organizations

Main Article Content

Nunta Bootnoi

Abstract

The influence of administrator characteristics and management behaviors on the administrative effectiveness of local government organizations was investigated in Lampang Province, Thailand. A quantitative methodology was used to study a sample of officers (N=416) who worked under local government organizations. A questionnaire with a reliability of .97 was used as the tool for collecting information. Data were analyzed by using descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling for testing hypotheses. It was concluded that the proposed model explained the data adequately. The impact of the variables in the proposed model was as follows: 1)  administrators’ characteristics had a direct, positive influence on their management behaviors, with a path coefficient of .90; 2) administrators’ characteristics had a direct, positive influence on their administrative effectiveness, with a path coefficient of .77, and an indirect, positive influence on their administrative effectiveness via their management behaviors, with a path coefficient of .22; and 3) administrators’ management behaviors had a direct, positive influence on their administrative effectiveness, with a path coefficient of .24.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Barnard, C. (1966). Organization and management. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Bangmo, S. (2015). Organization and management (6th ed.). Bangkok: Witthayaphat.

Boonkob, P. (2015). Nawattakam thō̜ngthin wādūai kānčhat tham ngoppramān rāičhāi phư̄a kānphatthanā thō̜ngthin sưksā chapho̜ kō̜ranī thētbānmư̄ang sīsakēt [Local innovation on budgeting for local development, a case study of Sisaket Municipality]. CMU Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 8(1), 198–222. Retrieved from https://www.tcithaijo.org/index.php/CMUJLSS/article/view/64646

Boonleaing, S., Naipinit, A., & Phromsaka-na-sakonnakhon, T. (2012). Laksana phāwa khō̜ng phū nam thī dī nai kānbō̜rihān ʻongkō̜n pokkhrō̜ng sūan thō̜ngthin [Good leadership characteristics for local administrative organizations].
Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 29(2), 97–112. Retrieved from https://www.tci-thaijo.org/ index.php/HUSO/article/view/6133/5348

Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Ling (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concept, application, and programming. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

Chandarasorn, V. (2013). Thritsadī kānnam nayōbāi sāthārana pai patibat [Theory of public policy implementation, 6th ed.]. Bangkok: Prigwhan Graphic Ltd.

Charoensuk, N., Eakphet, C., Thamsasajakarn, W. (2015). Rūpbǣp phāwa phū nam thī mī prasitthiphon khō̜ng phūbō̜rihān Khana Kharusāt mahāwitthayālai rātchaphat phāk tai [A model of effective leadership for Faculty of Education Administrators of Southern Rajabhat University]. The Journal of Faculty of Applied Arts, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok, 8(2), 54–64.

Clawson, J. (2019). 11 Key Characteristics of a global business leader. Retrieved from https://ideas.darden. virginia.edu/11-key-characteristics-of-a-global-business-leader.

Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.

Drucker, P. (1999). Management challenges for the 21st century. New York, NY: Harper Business.

Kaewnaree, K. (2014). Phāwa phū nam kān plīanplǣng thī song phon tō̜ prasitthiphāp læ prasitthiphon kān patibat ngān khō̜ng hūanā sūan ʻongkō̜n pokkhrō̜ng sūan thō̜ngthin čhangwat lam pāng [The transformational leadership affecting the efficiency and effectiveness of work performance and activities of the operation section chiefs of local administrative organizations in Lampang Province]. (Master’s Thesis of Business Administration, Lampang Nation University). Retrieved from http://it.nation.ac.th/research/detailproj.php?id=116

Kaplan R., & Norton, D. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategy management system. Harvard Business Review, Jan.-Feb, 75–85. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2007/07/using-the-balanced-scorecard-as-a-strategic-management-system

Kline, R. (2005). Principle and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
OCSC: Office of the Civil Service Commission (2002). Chut kān rīanrū dūai tonʻēng laksūt kānbō̜rihān ngān: kānbō̜rihān čhatkān phāk rat nǣo mai [Self-learning series in administration course: New public sector management]. Bangkok: Civil Service Development Institute.

Pannasil, P., Kenaphoom, S., & Kosolkittiamporn, S. (2015). Botbāt khō̜ng phūbō̜rihān thō̜ngthin nai satawat thī 21 [The role of local executive in the 21st century]. Journal of MCU Peace Studies, 3(2), 146–161.

Passer, M., & Smith, R. (2011). Psychology: The science of mind and behavior (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Inc.

Phongwarin, T. (2017). Kānbō̜rihān khwāmkhatyǣng yāng sāngsan [Creative conflict management]. Retrieved from https://www.hrcenter.co.th/file/columns/hr_f_20170510_171555.pdf.

Pramuljukko, K., & Chongsomchai, C. (2016). panhā kānbō̜rihān ngoppramān khō̜ng ʻongkān bō̜rihānsūan tambon nai khēt ʻamphœ̄ sī somdet čhangwat rō̜i ʻet [The budget management problems of sub-district administrative organizations in Si-Somdet district, Roi-Et province]. Journal of Politics and Government, 6(1), 202–212.

Rajachalerm, S. (1997). Bǣp phāwa phū nam khō̜ng phūbō̜rihān rōngrīan sangkat samnakngān kān prathom sưksā čhangwat ʻuttara dit [Leadership styles of school administrators under the Office of Uttaradit Provincial Primary
Education] (Master’s Thesis of Education, Educational Administration), Graduate College, Chiang Mai University.

Schermerhorn, J., Hunt, J., & Osborn. R. (2003). Organizational behavior (8th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Schumacker, R., & Lomax, R. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Stevens, J. (1986). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Stogdill, R. (1974). Handbook of leadership: a survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.

Suvarnabhumi, P., Srisai, S., Viphatakarus, J., & Bunwiset, S. (2011). Rūpbǣp kānbō̜rihān čhatkān thī mī prasitthiphon khō̜ng ʻongkān bō̜rihānsūan tambon nai klum čhangwat phāk nư̄a tō̜n lāng klum thī nưng prathēt Thai [The administration model for effectiveness of the sub-district administrative organizations at the lower northern provinces
Group 1 in Thailand]. Journal of the Association of Researchers 16(3), 102–117.

Thamson, T., & Dokthaisong, B. (2015). Phāwa phū nam thāng kānmư̄ang khō̜ng nāyokthētsamontrī nai kānbō̜rihān thētsabān tambon nai khēt phư̄nthī phāk nư̄a tō̜n bon [The political leadership of the mayors in subdistrict municipality administrations in the area of upper northern region]. Rajamangala University of Technology Thanyaburi Global Business and Economics Review, 10 (1), 171–190.

Tonson, M. (2001). Phrưttikam ʻongkān [Organizational behavior]. Bangkok: ExberNet.

Waraphin, C., Chaiyakan, P., Bunjerdrit, S., & Homying, W. (2014). Khunnalaksana phāwa phū nam yuk mai kap samatthana kānbō̜rihān ngān bǣp mư̄ʻāchīp khō̜ng palat thētsabān nai phāk klāng [Attributes of the modern leadership with professional management competencies of municipal clerks in the central region]. Journal of the Association of Researchers, 19(1), 86–96.

Yukl, G. (1998). Leadership in organization (4th ed.). Englewood cliffs, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.