Place Identity in Use Transformation Process of Old Building in The Old Town

Main Article Content

Peeraya Boonprasong


Understanding of use transformation process that takes part of meaning and recognition function is useful for generating a framework of value assessment in place, since insistence of self-efficacy during the process of identity is to confirm flexibility of physical design in place. Relevant literature reviews about identity and process of identity construct the idea that identity is an individual perspective representing human relation to his or her surrounding in the forms of requirements through preferred activities in place subjectively and objectively. This paper shows that understanding of use transformation based on continuity of place could integrate the process of identity to include the paradigm of ethics via behavioral expressions.


Article Details



1. Aylward, G. (1979). Conservation and Rehabilitation. London, United Kingdom: Cox & Wyman Ltd.
2. Boonprasong, P. (2017). USE TRANSFORMATION PROCESS OF SHOPHOUSES: A CASE STUDY OF THA TIEN’S SHOPHOUSE, BANGKOK. (Doctor of Philosophy), Chulalongkorn University, Retrieved from
3. Cheshmehzangi, A., & Heat, T. (2012). Urban Identities: Influences on Socio-Environmental Values and Spatial Inter-Relations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 36, 253-264. doi:
4. Creswell, T. (2005). Place: a short introduction. UK: Blackwell Publishing.
5. Cullen, G. (1961). The Concise Townscape: Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
6. Fisch, R., & Giebeler, G. (2009). Refurbishment Manual: Maintenance Conversions and Extensions. In J. Liese (Ed.): Altusried-Krugzell: Kosel GmbH & Co.KG.
7. Hashemnezhad, H., Heidari, A. A., & Hoseini, P. M. (Winter 2013). “Sense of Place” and “Place Attachment” International Journal of Architecture and Urban Development, Vol. 3(No. 1), 5-12.
8. Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1988). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes: Routledge.
9. Jokilehto, J. (2006). World Heritage: Defining the Outstanding Universal Value. City & Time. 2(2)(1), 1-10.
10. Khanjanusthiti, P. (2009). Karn Anurak Moradok Sathapattayakam lae Chomchon [Conservation of Architectural Heritage and Community]: Faculty of Architecture, Chulalongkorn University.
11. Lynch, K. A. (1960 ). The Image of the City. the United States of America: The Technology Press & Harvard University Press.
12. Mason, R. (2004). Fixing Historic Preservation: A Constructive Critique of "Significance" [Research and Debate] Places, 16(1), 64-72.
13. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, Self, and Society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist (C. W. Morris Ed.): University of Chicago Press.
14. Orbasli, A. (2008). Architectural Conservation: Principles and Practice. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
15. Proshansky, H., Fabian, A., & Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place-identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3(1), 57-83. doi:
16. Proshansky, H. M. (1976). Environmental psychology and the real world. American Psychologist, 31(4), 303-310. doi:
17. Sangsihanart, S. (2018). Reading Urban Identity: Approach to Culture, Landscape and Place. NAJUA: Architecture, Design and Built Environment, 33, E21-E34.
18. Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: an empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347-358. doi:
19. Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity: Cambridge University Press.
20. Tidkorn. (2008). Ekalak - Uttalak (No.445). Retrieved from City's Life website:
21. Tiesdell, S., Heath, T., & Oc, T. (1996). Revitalizing Historic Urban Quarters. Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.
22. Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). PLACE AND IDENTITY PROCESSES. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 205-220. doi:
23. The Nara Document on Authenticity, (1994).
24. Yaldız, E., & Asatekin, N. G. (2016). Evaluations Of Cultural Perception Performance By Users On The Basis Of Re-Use Of Monumental Building: The Case Of Sivas’ Buruciye Madrasah. Megaron, 11(3), 333-343. doi:doi:10.5505/megaron.2016.66487
25. Zancheti, S. M., & Jokilehto, J. (1997). Values and Urban Conservation Planning: Some Reflections on Principles and Definitions. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 3(1), 37-51. doi:10.1080/13556207.1997.10785179