Good Governance Achievement and Social Responsibility of Saensuk Town Municipality, Mueang Saensuk District, Chonburi Province

Main Article Content

Charin Suankaew Kamolporn kalyanamitra

Abstract

There are four objectives of this study as follows: 1. To study the achievement of good governance and social responsibility of Sansuk Town Municipality, Mueang Chonburi, Chonburi Province 2. To study the good governance of Sansuk Town Municipality, Mueang Chonburi, Chonburi Province  3.To compare the opinions of the people towards good governance with gender, marital status, education, age, occupation, income per month. 4. To study the relationship between the good governance administration. The population in this study is the people living of Sansuk Town Municipality. Mueang Chonburi, Chonburi Province. Descriptive statistics are preliminary analyzes to describe the general characteristics of the respondents. Simple correlation test to calculate the relationship between two variables from Pearson's correlation formula.


          The research found that:


  1. Most respondents opinions on the achievement of good social and social responsibility administration of Sansuk Town Municipality, Mueang Chonburi, Chonburi Proince, all aspects were at the high level.

  2. Most respondents have opinions on the administration of good governance of Sansuk Tow Municipality, Mueang Chonburi, Chonburi Province, all aspects were at the high level.

  3. Individuals with different sexes have a positive opinion on the good governance and social responsibility of Sansuk Tow Municipality, Mueang Chonburi, Chonburi Province, all aspects of the benefits of the people by state-of-the-art performance and value reducing operational steps. There were statistically significant differences at the .05 level.

  4. People with marital status, educational background, there are different opinions about the achievement of good governance and social responsibility of Sansuk Town Municipality, Mueang Chonburi, Chonburi Province. There was no statistically significant difference at the .05 level. The good society and good governance There was a positive relationship and a high correlation (r = .987).

Keywords

Article Details

Section
Research Articles