Role of Election Organization at National and Local Levels on Public Opinions to Promote Democratic Society How Could Public Opinion Promote Democratic Society?: Role of Election Organization at the National and Local Levels on Protecting Public Opinion and Inspiring Promising Democracy in ASEAN as a Whole

Main Article Content

Phaibul Changrien Yannakorn Toprayoon Supatra Assavasukee Chai Ching Tan

Abstract

This study targets to identify and put into a structure organizing the elements that election organization can exploit to support and enable the public opinions in the election process in order to benefit towards promoting democratic society. The methodology is literature review. The deductive approach of the literature review is a synthesizing mechanism which leads to a simple conceptual framework illuminating the role of election organization in protecting public opinion and inspiring promising democracy. Four elements should be actively pursued to support and enable the roles of election organizations, namely the establishment of ISO Quality Management Systems (QMS), election observations, good educational systems, and normative institutional rule and body. Public opinions form an essential input to a quality election process, as argued for the expressive, normative, prospective, and expectation-oriented information the government and relevant political parties can make use of. The literature review arrives at a simple input-process-output framework that puts a structural guideline for the election organizations to facilitate for a quality and equality of public opinions.

Keywords

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

Arnold, A.K. (2010). Problems of public opinion. Retrieved November 1, 2015 from https://blogs.worldbank.org/ publicsphere/problems-public-opinion.
Bevan, S., & Krewel, M. (2015). Responsive elections: The effect of public opinion on political campaigns. Electoral Studies, 1-8, https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.electstud. 2015.07.006.
Christiano, T.D. (2015). Democracy: normative theory. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 6, 85-89.
Freeland, E.P. (2015). Public opinions: Social attitudes. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 19, 562-568.
Héricourt, J., & Spielvogel, G. (2010). Public opinions and immigration: Individual attitudes, interest groups and the media. SOPEMI: International Migration Outlook.
Huntington, S, P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (2012). The integrity of elections: The role of regional organizations. Stockholm: Trydells Tryckeri,
Ministry of Community, Sport and Cultural Development (2014). Elector organization guide to local government elections in B.C. Retrieved October 31, 2015 from https://www.google.co.th/url?sa=t&rct= j&q= &esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CBsQFjAAahUKEwiamMbKjO_IAhWjq6YKHePuBsM&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cscd.gov.bc.ca%2Flgd%2Flibrary%2Felection2014%2FElector_Organization_Guide.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF9tCl4ia5q6vp8kjlQ-3S sJmltPA&sig2=Q9kZxWTKw2s_QTrJhrKrhA&bvm=bv.106379543,d.dGY&cad=rja.
Key, V.O. (1961). Public opinion and American democracy. New York: Knopf.
O’Connor, K., & Sabato, L.J. (2008). American government: Continuity and change. Texas: Pearson Education, Inc.
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (2010). Election observation handbook. Warsaw: Poligrafus Andrzej Adamiak. “Refeudalization,” World Heritage Encyclopedia. Retrieved November 1, 2015 from https://self.gutenberg.org/articles/refeudalization Shamir, Jacob & Michal Shamir, 2000. The Anatomy of Public Opinion. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.