Perception, Attitude and Practices of Home Birth among Mothers of Under-Five Children in a Migrant Community of Southwest, Nigeria

Main Article Content

Adeyimika T. Desmennu
Aderonke H. Yerokun
Oyedunni S. Arulogun

Abstract

Homebirth practice and its associated risks have not been adequately explored in Nigeria. This study therefore, investigated perception, attitude and homebirth practices of mothers of under-five children in a Nigerian migrant community. A total of 399 mothers were sampled and data was collected using mixed methods. The average age of the respondents was 32.1+8.8 years, 50% of them had secondary education, 81.5% were housewives and 80% perceived homebirth as safe. A total of 61.9% of the respondents registered for antenatal care. In this study, home delivery practices refer to the involvement skilled attendant (17.2%), monitoring of deliveries (10.7%), cutting umbilical cord with sterilized material (95.7%), birth timing (36.7%) and provision for referral (5.3%). Factors influencing preference for homebirth included economic status, time the labor started, health workers’ attitude, cultural belief and distance to health facility. The study found that homebirth among the target population lacked the involvement of skilled birth attendants. Thus, community engagement and awareness on the importance of having a skilled attendant during home birth is highly recommended.

Article Details

How to Cite
Desmennu, A. T., Yerokun, A. H., & Arulogun, O. S. (2018). Perception, Attitude and Practices of Home Birth among Mothers of Under-Five Children in a Migrant Community of Southwest, Nigeria. Journal of Population and Social Studies [JPSS], 26(2), 165–180. Retrieved from https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jpss/article/view/117181
Section
Research Articles
Author Biography

Adeyimika T. Desmennu, Department of Health Promotion and Education, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

Corresponding author

References

• Bazzano, A.N., Krikwood, B., Tawiah-Agyemang, C., Owusu-Agyel, S., & Adongo, P. (2008). Social costs of skilled attendance at birth in rural Ghana. International Journal of Gynecology Obstetric, 102, 91-94.

• Boucher, D., Bennett C. McFarlin B., & Freeze R. (2009). Staying home to give birth; why women in the United States choose home birth midwifery. Women’s Health Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 54(2), 425-428.

• Bukar, M., & Jauro, Y.S. (2013). Home births and postnatal practices in Madagali, North-Eastern Nigeria. Nigeria Journal of Clinical Practice, 16, 232-237.

• Christiana, R.T., Cynthia, L.H., Michael, J.D., & Peter, H. (2010). Why do some women still prefer traditional birth attendants and home delivery? A qualitative study on delivery care services in West Java Province, Indonesia, Bio Med Central for Pregnancy and Childbirth 2010, 10:43. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-10-43.

• Cohen, J. (2003). Why homebirth? Midwifery today. Retrieved from www.midwiferytoday.com

• Community development report, Ibadan North LGA, 2012 – unpublished

• Darmstadt, G.L., Bhutta, Z.A., Cousens, S., Adam T., Walker, N., & de Bernis, L. (2005). Evidence – based, cost-effective Interventions; how many newborn babies can we save. Lancet, 365 (9463), 977-988.

• Darmstadt. G.L., Lee, A.C., Cousens, S., Sibley, L., Bhutta, Z.A., Donnay, F., … Lawn, J.E. (2009). 60 million non-facility births; who can deliver in community settings to reduce intrapartum-related deaths? International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 107 (suppl 1), s89-s112.

• Envuladu, E.A., Agbo, H.A., Lassa, S., Kigbu, J.H., & Zoakah A.I. (2013). Factors determining the choice of a place of delivery among pregnant women in Russia village of Jos North, Nigeria achieving the MDGs 4 and 5, International Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Research, 2(1), 23-27.

• Fraser, D.M., Cooper, M.A., & Fletcher G. (2003). Myles textbook for midwives. International edition, fourteenth edition. Church Hill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

• Gabrysch, S.C.L., Bedrinana, E., Bautista, M.A., Malca, R., Campbella, O.M.R., & Mirandaa J.J. (2009). Cultural adaptation of birthing servies in rurul Ayacucho, Peru Lessons from the field. Bull World Health Organization, 87, 724-729.

• Koblinsky, M., Matthews, Z., Hussin, J., Mavalankar, D., & Mridha M. K. (2006). Going to scale with professional skilled care. Lancet, 368, 1377-1386.

• Johnson, K.C., & Daviss, B.A. (2005). Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives; large prospective study in North America. British Medical Journal, 330(7505), 1416.

• Lamina M.A. (2011). A survey of home delivery and new-born care practices among women in a suburban area of Western Nigeria. ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology, Article ID 983542. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/983542.

• Lawn, J.E., Haws, R.A., Darmstadt, G.L, Yakoob, M.Y., Menezes, E.V., Soomro, T., & Bhutta Z.A. (2009). 32 million still births; Epidemiology and framework for evaluation of interventions to prevent still births in low and middle-income settings. Bio Med Central of Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9 (Suppl 1).

• Lily, K., Gunnar, B., Ellen, C., & Address, M.J. (2013). Why some women fail to give birth at health facilities: a qualitative study of women’s perceptions of perinatal care from rural Southern Malawi, Reproductive Health, 10:9. doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-10-9.

• Lloyd, P., C., Mabogunje, A.L., & Awe, B. (2009). The city of Ibadan. Cambridge University Press.

• Lwanga, S.K., & Lemeshow, S. (1991). Sample size determination in health studies: A practical guide. World Health Organisation (WHO) Geneva.

• MacDorman M.F., Matthews, T.J., & Declercq, E. (2012). Home birth in the United States, 1990-2009. NCHS Data Brief, no 84, U.S.D.O.A.A.H. Services Hyattsville, MD, National Center for Health Statistics.

• Mwifadhi M., Joanna A.S., Adiel, K.M., Brigit O., Hassan M., Marcel, T., & David S. (2007). Factors affecting home delivery in rural Tanzania, Tropical Medicine & International Health. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01855.

• National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF International. (2014). Nigeria demographic and health survey 2013. Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF International.

• Okeshola, F.B., & Ismail, T.S. (2013). Determinants of home delivery among Hausa in Kaduna South local government area of Kaduna state, Nigeria, Department of Sociology, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(5), 78.

• Otis, K., & Brett, J. (2008). Barriers to hospital births: why do many Bolivian women give birth at home? Reverend Panam Salud Publication.

• Rahman, M.H., Mosley, W.H., Ahmed S., & Akhter, H.H. (2008). Does service accessibility reduce socioeconomic differentials in maternity care seeking? Evidence from rural Bangladesh. J BioSoc Sci, 40, 19 – 33.

• Rajendra, R.W., Svend S., & Birgitte B.N. (2004). Socioeconomic and physical distance to the maternity hospital as predictors for place of delivery: an observation study from Nepal, Bio Med Central Pregnancy and Childbirth, 4, 8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-4-8.

• Ravi, R.P., & Ravishankar, A.K. (2014). Does socio-demographic factors influence women’s choice of place of delivery in rural areas of Tamilnadu state in India. American Journal of Public Health Research, 2(3), 75-80.

• Van den Broek N.R., White S.A., Ntonya C., Ngwale M., Cullinan T.R., & Molyneux M.E. (2003). Reproductive health in rural Malawi: a population-based survey. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 110, 902-908.

• Vernon, D. (2007). Men at birth. Canberra. Australian College of Midwives