A Comparison of Moves and the Sequence of Moves in Research Abstracts in Standard and Predatory Journals

Article Sidebar

PDF

Main Article Content

Chatchanan Yathip
Songsri Soranastaporn

Abstract

The purpose of the recent study was to compare rhetorical moves and move sequences in scientific research articles published by standard and predatory journals. The corpus consisted of 100 research abstracts (50 standard and 50 predatory abstracts) published between 2011 and 2015. The abstracts were analyzed based on Santos’s (1996) move model consisting of five main moves: ‘Situating the research’, ‘Presenting the research’, ‘Describing the methodology’, ‘Summarizing the results’, and ‘Discussing the research’. To increase the reliability of the analysis, three inter-raters were invited to verify the data. The findings show five moves in two corpora. All moves in the standard corpus occurred more than 60% of the time and are considered as conventional moves. However, four moves in the predatory journal abstracts [Move 3 or ‘Describing the methodology’ (94%), Move 4 or ‘Summarizing the results’ (82%), Move 2 or ‘Presenting the research’ (68%), and Move 5 or ‘Discussing the research’ (64%)] occurred as conventional moves; Move 1, or ‘Situating the research’,which occurred in only 48% of cases, was an exception. In addition, 50 abstracts in the standard corpus exhibited 26 move sequences; on the contrary, in the predatory corpus of 50 abstracts, 41 move sequenceswere found. The findings reveal that moves and move sequences of predatory abstracts are varied and do not conform to those found instandard journals. Thus, it can be concluded that move analysis may be used to distinguish between standard (peer-reviewed) journals and predatory (non-peer-reviewed) journals.

Keywords: Move analysis, research abstract, scientific research
article, predatory journals

Article Details

How to Cite
Yathip, C., & Soranastaporn, S. (2016). A Comparison of Moves and the Sequence of Moves in Research Abstracts in Standard and Predatory Journals. Journal of Studies in the English Language, 11. Retrieved from https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jsel/article/view/73318
Issue
Vol. 11 (2016)
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:  Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.  Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.  Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Author Biographies

Chatchanan Yathip

Chatchanan Yathip graduated with master degree in Applied Linguistics program, Liberal Arts, Mahidol University. Now he is a faculty member at Dhonburi Rajabhat University. His e-mail address is [email protected].

Songsri Soranastaporn

Songsri Soranastaporn is the cofounder (2008) and the secretary general of the Thai Simulation and Gaming Association. She is the president of the e-Learning Association of Thailand (www.e lat.or.th). She is an editor and reviewer of both Thai and international journals and conferences such as Current Topics in Management, The Kasetsart Journal (Social Sciences) at Kasetsart University, the Journal of Language and Culture.
E-mail: [email protected]