Main Article Content
The study was a part of larger study to explore the perceptions of Thai families on factors influencing their well-being based on life cycle. There were three phases including; 1) qualitative study with 69 of totally 310 families throughout Thailand, which was collected data during August-November 2016, 2) survey study with 1,604 of totally 6,158 families during October-December 2017, and 3) qualitative study with 28 risk families of totally 100 families during January-March 2018. The common findings revealed that migrating of the family members to earn money creating the families in risk. Rating scores of well-being was decreased in adolescence and old age period. Rising income and welfare were key needs for these people. Therefore, policy suggestion for sustainable Isan family well-being is recommended.
2. Jongudomkarn D, Prompakping B, Khlangsaeng K, Chanpen U. A Comparative Study on the Quality of life and Well-being of the Poor Families in Semi-Urban Area and Remote Area. . Journal of Nursing Sciences and Health. 2010; 33(3): 40-51 (In Thai).
3. Jongudomkarn D. & Camfield L. Exploring the quality of life of people in North Eastern and Southern Thailand. Social Indicators Research. 2006, 78(3), 489-529.
4. Jongudomkarn D, Kancha Y, Jaemsaeng S, Boonchuay P, Wongyai W, Sirianansap S, Boontaka A, Tongmee P, Namkrieng C, Klangsaeng K. Development of the Indicator for Well-Being of the People Living in the Areas of Local Government Organization. Journal of Nursing Sciences and Health. 2009; 32(2), 67-79 (In Thai).
5. National Economic and Social Development Plan Number 12 (2017-2021). Bangkok: Office of the Prime Minister, 2017 (in Thai).
6. Jongudomkarn D, Phupaibul R, Kumhom R, Tejagupta C, Wacharasin C, Deoisres W, et al. Perceptions of the Thai Family Well-Being: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Nursing Sciences and Health. 2017; 40(1), 14-29 (In Thai).
7. Jumpaklai A, Tangcholtip K, Pluemchalern S. Well-Being in Thailand: Dream or Reality? Nakhonpathom: Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, 2018 (In Thai).
8. Creswell JW, Clark VP. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2007.
9. Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, 2003.
10. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.
11. Denzin NK., Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. 2nd edition. USA: SAGE, 2000.
12. Omair A. Sample size estimate and sampling techniques for selecting a representative sample. Journal of Health Specialists. 2014; 2(4), 142-7.
13. Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Shaw.
14. Jongudomkarn D. Family Health Nursing: Concept and Theory Implications for Crisis Interventionn. 3rd ed. Khon Kaen: Khlangnanawitaya, 2018 (In Thai).
15. Samutachak B, Gongaew T, Uden R. Family Well-Being of Thai. Nakhonpathom: TRF & Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, 2017 (In Thai).
16. Office for National Economic and Social Development Board. Retrieved Jan 12, 2019, From: http://social.nesdb.go.th/SocialStat/StatDefault_Final.aspx
17. Office for National Statistics. Retried Jan 12, 2019, From: http://www.nso.go.th/sites/2014/DocLib13/ด้านสังคม/สาขารายได้/เศรษฐกิจสังคมครัวเรือน/60/SocioSum60_First-6-Month.pdf