Impact of Tax Planning on Cost of Debt of Listed Company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand

Main Article Content

Sathaya Thanjunpong
Thatphong Awirothananon

Abstract

          This study aims to investigate the impact of tax planning on the cost of debt of listed firms in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. The data was collected from the annual report during the year 2014 - 2016. The samples comprise of 813 samples. The tax planning was measured by effective tax rate, while the cost of debt was measured by the ratio of finance costs to total debt. Data analysis applied multiple regression analysis. Overall, this study found that the tax planning had insignificantly negative effects on the cost of debt, while that the tax planning of thin capital firms had significantly positive effects on the cost of debt. Regarding control variables, this study found that leverage and capital intensity had significantly positive effects on the cost of debt. However, the profitability of non-thin capital firm had significantly positive effects on the cost of debt. The results could be used as a guideline for regulators to implement taxation in various measures and corporate governance measures for listed firms in the Stock Exchange of Thailand.

Article Details

How to Cite
Thanjunpong, S., & Awirothananon, T. (2019). Impact of Tax Planning on Cost of Debt of Listed Company in the Stock Exchange of Thailand. Parichart Journal, 32(2), 104–120. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/parichartjournal/article/view/128672
Section
Research Articles

References

[1] Trachutham, C., & Trachutham, D. (2008). Input tax not deductible. Sanpakornsarn Journal, 55(10), 55-62. (In Thai)

[2] Dyreng, S. D., Hanlon, M., & Maydew, E. L. (2008). Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 61–82.

[3] Masri, I., & Martani, D. (2014). Tax avoidance behavior towards the cost of debt. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 7(3), 235-249.

[4] Richardson, R., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2015). The impact of financial distress on corporate tax avoidance spanning the global financial crisis: Evidence from Australia. Economic Modelling, 44(C), 44-53.

[5] Graham, J. R., & Tucker, A. L. (2006). Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 81(3), 563-594.

[6] Lim, Y. (2011). Tax avoidance, cost of debt and shareholder activism: Evidence from Korea. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(2), 456-470.

[7] Taylor, G., & Richardson, G. (2012). International corporate tax avoidance practices: Evidence from Australian firms. The International Journal of Accounting, 47(4), 469-496.

[8] Kholbadalov, U. (2012). The relationship of corporate tax avoidance, cost of debt and institutionalownership: Evidence from Malaysia. Retrieved April 12, 2016, from: https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/146568.

[9] Richardson, G., Lanis, R., & Leung, S. C. M. (2014). Corporate tax aggressiveness, outside directors, and debt policy: An empirical analysis. Journal of Corporate Finance, 25(C), 107-121.

[10] Lin, S., Tong, N., & Tucker, A. L. (2014). Corporate tax aggression and debt. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40(1), 227-241.

[11] Thanjunpong, S., & Bangmek, R. (2017). The influence of board of directors, audit committee and ownership structure impact on tax planning: An empirical evidence of Thailand. Journal of Accounting Profession, 13(37), 29-44. (In Thai)

[12] Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction (In communications). American Economic Review, 53(3), 433-443.

[13] Pittman, J. A., & Fortin, S. (2004). Auditor choice and the cost of debt capital for newly public firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(1), 113-136.

[14] Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing & investment decisions: When firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187-221.

[15] DeAngelo, H., & Masulis, R. W. (1980). Optimal capital structure under corporate and personal taxation. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 3-29.

[16] Taylor, G., & Richardson, G. (2013). The determinants of thinly capitalized tax avoidance structures: Evidence from Australian firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 22(1), 12-25.

[17] Gupta, S., & Newberry, K. (1997). Determinants of the variability in corporate effective tax rates: Evidence from longitudinal data. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16(1),
1-34.

[18] Maβbaum, A., & Sureth, C. (2009). Thin capitalization rules and entrepreneurial capital structure decisions. BuR Business Research Journal, 2(2), 147-169.

[19] Siritos, S. (2003). Problems are income taxation from holding company in Thailand. Master of Laws Dissertation, Thammasat University. (In Thai)

[20] Buettner, T., Overesch, M., Schreiber, U., & Wamser, G. (2012). The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the capital structure of multinational firms. Journal of Public Economics, 96(11-12), 930-938.

[21] Shieh, W. S., Ou, J. N., & Wang, J. C. (2014). The impact of anti-thin capitalization rules on capital structure in Taiwan. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(11),
142-159.

[22] Hair, F., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis.
(7th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.