AN INVESTIGATION ON CHINESE TEACHING AND LEARNING SITUATION OF SCHOOLS IN NORTHERN THAILAND

Main Article Content

Tiansong Wang Yinsheng Li

Abstract

     The purposes of this research were to study and compare Chinese language learning conditions of students in Chinese schools in Northern Thailand with regard to 6 aspects including
curriculum, instructors, leaners, learning activities, supporting factors, and evaluation; and to study and compare conditions of Chinese language instruction management of teachers in Chinese schools in Northern Thailand with regard to fve aspects including curriculum management, educational supervision, instructional management, academic activities management, and learning measurement and evaluation. The research sample which was obtained by convenience sampling technique consisted of two groups: (1) a group of 342 students in 89 schools offering Chinese language instruction in Northern Thailand and (2) a group of 206 teachers in 89 schools offering Chinese language instruction in Northern Thailand. The sample size was determined based on Taro Yamane’s formula. The employed research instrument was a 5-scale Likert questionnaire. Statistics employed for data analysis and hypothesis testing were the percentage, mean, standard deviation, t-test (independent samples), and F-test (one-way ANOVA).


     The research results were as follows:


     1. The majority of students in schools offering Chinese language instruction in Northern Thailand had opinions that the current overall condition of Chinese language learning was practiced at the high level. When specifc aspects of Chinese language learning were considered, it was found that all aspects were practiced at the high level and could be ranked based on their rating means from top to bottom as follows: the leaners, the curriculum, the learning activities, the supporting factors, the evaluation, and the instructors, respectively.


     2. Students in schools offering Chinese language instruction in Northern Thailand, who were of different genders and who were in different provinces did not signifcantly differ in their
opinions toward the overall and by-aspect practices of Chinese language learning. Meanwhile, a signifcant difference at the .05 level was found between opinions of the students in different class years toward the evaluation aspect. However, no signifcant difference was found in their opinions toward both the overall and other aspects.


     3. The overall condition of Chinese language instruction management of teachers in schools offering Chinese language instruction in Northern Thailand was practiced at the high level. When specifc aspects of Chinese language instruction management were considered, it was found that all aspects were practiced at the high level and could be ranked based on their rating means from top to bottom as follows: the instructional management, the curriculum management, the educational supervision, the learning measurement and evaluation, and the academic activities management, respectively.


     4. Teachers in Chinese schools in Northern Thailand with different statuses, ages, and educational qualifcations did not differ signifcantly in their overall and by-aspect practices of
Chinese language instruction management.

Keywords

Article Details

How to Cite
Wang, T., & Li, Y. (2019). AN INVESTIGATION ON CHINESE TEACHING AND LEARNING SITUATION OF SCHOOLS IN NORTHERN THAILAND. Panyapiwat Journal, 11(2), 244-256. Retrieved from https://www.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/pimjournal/article/view/207586
Section
Research Article

References

Aksaranukroh, S. (2009). Teaching of language and culture skills. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Printing House. [in Thai]
Amornvivat, S. (2003). Academic article on improvement of curriculum for quality of Thai people in the next decade. Bangkok: The Royal Institute. [in Thai]
Attawet, P. (2015). Development of curriculum in English language for medical professionals of Radiation Division, Central Chest Institute of Thailand. Master of arts’ thesis, Kasetsart University. [in Thai]
Bureau of Academic Affairs, Offce of Basic Education Commission (2017). Statistics of teacher-students of provinces in the north. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand printing. [in Thai]
Department of Academic Affairs. (2016). Administration of fundamental education curriculum of
English language subject as of Year 2011. Bangkok: Kurusapa Ladphrao Printing. [in Thai]
Huang, M. (2015). Guideline for teaching Mandarin Chinese language in senior high schools in
Bangkok. Master of education program’s thesis, Mahidol University. [in Thai]
Jaithiang, A. (2003). Principles of teaching. Bangkok: Odeon Store printing. [in Thai]
Jongsathapornsit, S. (2014). Study of method of learning English language of the Grade 11 students of schools under under Department of General Educationof Bangkok. Master of education program’s thesis, Silpakorn University. [in Thai]
Kaiyawan, Y. (2000). Techniques and methods of teaching. Bangkok: Suesermkrungthep. [in Thai]
Kwangsawas, T. (2006). Manual in English teaching. MahaSarakham: MahaSarakham University press. [in Thai]
Leksukhum, N. (2002). Effects of learning life skills for self-development in emotional intelligence (Good Smart Happy) based on the concept of the Department of mental health with psychological training program. Bangkok: Faculty of Education, Suan Dusit Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Li, J. J. (2008). The Defciencies of Chinese Teaching in the Northern Part of Thailand—Case Study of Montfort College Secondary School in Chiangmai. Journal of Baoshanshi, 27(4), 25-27. [in Chinese]
Li, Z. (2016). The Evaluation and the Pattern of Development of Chinese Teaching in Northern Part of Thailand in the Context of Chinese Language. Journal of Research on Education for Ethnic Minorities, 27(1), 131-133. [in Chinese]
Limnukorn, P. (1996). China in the era of dragon coming out of the cave. Bangkok: Sky Train. [in Thai]
Nammongkol, J. (2015). Effectiveness of academic administration in the perspective of executives and private school teachers teaching Chinese language in Bangkok and vicinity. Master of education’s thesis, Suan Dusit Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Offce of Basic Education Commission (2006). Curriculum and instruction management according to fundamental education curriculum as of Year 2001. Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Federation of Thailand. [in Thai]
Phutananusorn, J. (2014). Administration of Chinese language teaching in Chinese language schools under commission of private education promotion. Master of education’s thesis, Dhonburi Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Sanguannam, K. (2013). The Study of the use of foreign language curriculum (Chinese language) in schools under Bangkok affliation. Master of arts’ thesis, Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]
Sheffeld, E. (1974). Teaching in the Universities-No One Way. Montreal: Mc Gill-Queen’s University
Press.
Supametee, T. (1990). Curriculum and educational management. Bangkok: Department of Curriculum
and Instruction, Dhonburi College of teacher. [in Thai]
Tungsang, P. (2001). Development of the management curriculum for middle managers State
Railway of Thailand. Master of arts’ thesis, Mahidol University. [in Thai]
Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction: Syllabus for Education 305. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Visawatheranon, S. (2006). The development of teaching quality of secondary schools in the vicinity of Bangkok. Nonthaburi: Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University. [in Thai]
Worakham, P. (2016). Educational Research. Mahasarakham: Taksila printing. [in Thai]
Xu, Z. (2008). The Circumstance and the Prospect of Chinese Teaching in the Northern Part of Thailand. Academic Journal of Huaqiao University, 3, 116-118. [in Chinese]
Yamane, T. (2016). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row Publication.