Electronic Democracy: Strengthen or Hold Back?

Main Article Content

Veera Lertsomporn

Abstract

There are both strengthening and hold back effects for democracy in the whole picture from electronic democracy. Electronic democracy should not freely proceed by its nature. In contrast, public, civic, and other sector should consider together for strategic planning in short and long term in order to drive electronic democracy through positive and creative direction which it is more strengthening than hold back democracy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lertsomporn, V. (2016). Electronic Democracy: Strengthen or Hold Back?. Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 7(1), 138–160. Retrieved from https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/polscicmujournal/article/view/90772
Section
Academic Article

References

Abbot, J. (2012). [email protected] Revisited: Analysing the Socio-Political Impact of the Internet and New Social Media in East Asia. Third World Quarterly, vol 33, No. 2, 333-357.

Al Amer, M. A. (2009). Electronic Democracy, Strategy for Bahrain. (Doctor’s thesis). De Montfort University.

Bailard, C. S. (2012). Testing the Internet’s Effect on Democratic Satisfaction: A Multi-Methodological, Cross-National Approach. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9, 185–204.

Best, M. L. & Wade, K. W. (2007). Democratic and Anti-Democratic Regulators of the Internet: A Framework. The Information Society, 23, 405–411.

Branstetter, J. (2011). The (Broken?) Promise of Digital Democracy: An Early Assessment. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, vol. 7, Issue 3, 151-162.

Clift, S. (2000, November). An Internet of Democracy: Engaging the Fundamental Structure of the Internet with an Eye toward Making it a Real Democracy Network. Communications of the ACM, vol 43, No. 11, 31-32.

Duruji, M., Ayo, C., Gberevbie, D., and Oluranti, J. (2015). Proceedings of the European Conference one-Learning: The Impact of e-Democracy in Political Stability of Nigeria, 93-99.

Edick, C. (2015). The Golden Age of Piracy: Can Open-Source Democracy Redefine Citizenship for the Internet Age?. Harvard International Review, summer, 2015.

Firchow, P. (2013). View from Practice: A Cuban Spring? The Use of the Internet as a Tool of Democracy Promotion by United States Agency for International Development in Cuba. Information Technology for Development, vol. 19, No. 4, 347–356.

Fish, E. (2009). Is Internet Censorship Compatible with Democracy? Legal Restrictions of Online Speech in South Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal on Human Rights and the Law (2), 43-96.

Georgiadis, C. K. & Others. (Eds). (2012). Global Security, Safety and Sustainability & e-Democracy: 7th International and 4th e-Democracy Joint Conferences, ICGS3/e-Democracy 2011, Thessaloniki, Greece, August 24-26, 2011, Revised Selected Papers. London: Springer.

Gerodimos, R. Democracy and the Internet: Access, Engagement and Deliberation. Systematics, Cybernatics and Informatics, vol. 3, No. 6, 26-31.

Harašta, J. (2013). Cyber Security in Young Democracies. Jurisprudence, 20(4), 1457–1472.

Hussain, M. M. (2014). Digital Infrastructure Politics and Internet Freedom Stakeholders after the Arab Spring. Journal of International Affairs, Fall/Winter 2014, vol. 68, No. 1, 37-56.

Insua, D. R. & French, S. (Eds). (2010). Advances in Group Decision and Negotiation Volume 5 , e-Democracy: A Group Decision and Negotiation Perspective. London: Springer.

Konieczn, P. (2009, March). Governance, Organization, and Democracy on the Internet: The Iron Law and the Evolution of Wikipedia. Sociological Forum, vol. 24, No. 1, 162-192.

Kubicek, H. (2007). Electronic Democracy and Deliberative Consultation on Urban Projects "Putting E-Democracy into Context". Retrieved from https://https://www.ifib-consult.de/publikationsdateien/Creative_final.pdf

Lee, C., Chang, K. & Berry, F.S. (2011, May-June). Testing the Development and Diffusion of E-Government and E-Democracy: A Global Perspective. Public Administration Review, May | June 2011, 444-454.

Lidén, G. (2013). Supply of and demand for e-democracy: A study of the Swedish case. Information Polity, 18, 217–232.

Morozov, E. (2011, July-August). Technology’s Role in Revolution: Internet Freedom and Political Oppression. The Futurist, July-August, 18-21.

Moss, G. & Coleman, S. (2014). Deliberative Manoeuvres in the Digital Darkness: e-Democracy Policy in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 16, 410–427.

Norrisa, D. F. & Reddick, C. G. (2013). E-democracy at the American grassroots: Not now ...not likely?. Information Polity, 18, 201–216.

Nisbet, E. C., Stoycheff, E. & Pearce, K. E. (2012). Internet Use and Democratic Demands: A Multinational, Multilevel Model of Internet Use and Citizen Attitudes about Democracy. Journal of Communication 62, 249-265.

Rybnikova, I. (2014). E-democracy or e-domination? Critical observations of one edemocracy tool in a local governance Institution in Lithuania. CoaCtivity: Philosophy, Communication, vol. 22, No. 1, 3-13.

Sideridis, A. B. & Patrikakis, C. Z. (Eds). (2009). Next Generation Society Technological and Legal Issues: Third International Conference, e-Democracy 2009 Athens, Greece, September 23-25, 2009, Revised Selected Papers. New York: Springer.

Stoycheff, E. & Nisbet, E. C. (2014). What’s the Bandwidth for Democracy? Deconstructing Internet Penetration and Citizen Attitudes About Governance. Political Communication, 31, 628–646.

Taylor, J. (2013, September). Editorial: Electronic Democracy, Public Accountability and Public Service Information Provision. Information Polity, 18, 197–199.

Uzedhe, G. O. &. Okhaifoh, J. E. (2016, July). A Technological Framework for Transparent E-Voting Solution in the Nigerian Electoral System. Nigerian Journal of Technology (NIJOTECH), vol. 35, No. 3, 627–636.

Watson, R. T. & Mundy, B. (2001, January). A Strategic Perspective of Electronic Democracy. Communications of the ACM, vol 44, No. 1, 27-30.