Main Article Content
The purposes of this research were to 1) study level of academic leadership of administrators in the primary schools 2) compare the academic leadership of administrators among the primary schools and 3) study the approach of academic leadership development of administrators in the primary schools under the office of Kalasin primary education service area 2. The research procedures were divided into three phrases. The first stage was to study and synthesize the theory and literature revision. The second stage was to study level and compare the academic leadership of administrators in the primary schools by working with 289 samples ; 101 administrators and 188 teachers. The research instrument was a questionnaire and the statistics used for data analysis were mean, percentage, standard deviation and t-test independent. The third stage was the studying of the development of academic leadership of administrators in the primary schools under the office of Kalasin primary education service area 2 with 9 experts by using the formal interview and using content analysis. The results found that: 1. The academic leadership of administrators in the primary schools under the office of Kalasin primary education service area 2 in overall was moderate by raking from maximum to minimum average following (1) strategic determination of vision, mission and goal (2) surrounding support the learning culture (3) participatory learning (4) curriculum and teaching development (5) teacher and educational personnel development and (6) learner development, respectively. 2. The comparison of academic leadership of administrators in the primary schools under the office of Kalasin primary education service area 2 according to the opinion of school administrators and teachers from t-test was different with significant of statistic at 0.05. 3. The study of approach of academic leadership of administrators in the primary schools under the office of Kalasin primary education service area 2 was in the conclusion as follows: (1) integrating of core curriculum to local content and the worldwide knowledge (2) projects of teacher and educational personnel development as the topic of the seminar, workshop, research and development for learners and system of evaluation and monitoring continuously and (3) promotion of the classroom management for learner center to enhance students’ self-concept of their self-study to search for new idea and concept of the interesting topics.
Brownell, C.C. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of elementary school principals as. Instructional Leaders in reading. Ed. D. Dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate. School, University of Pacific.
Bunchom Srisa-ard. (2013). Statistical methods for research, Volume 1. 5th edition. Bangkok : Suweeriyasarn. [in Thai]
Bureau of Academic and Educational Standards, Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2009). Indicators and learning materials according to the Core Education Curriculum 2008. Bangkok : Printing Agriculture Cooperatives of Thailand. [in Thai]
Glickman, C.D. Gordon, S.P. and Ross-Gordon, J.M. (2007). Supervision and Supervision and Curriculum Development. 135-148. Instructional Leadership : A Developmental Approach. 7th Ed. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
Hallinger, Phillip and Joseph Murphy. (1985). “Assessing the Instructional Management Bihavior of Principal”. The Elementaly School Jurnal 86,2.
Hopkins, D., Harris, A., West, M., Ainscow, M. & Beresford, J. (1997). Creating the Conditions for Classroom Improvement. London: David Fulton Press.
Hoy, A. W., & W. K. Hoy. (2003). Instructional Leadership: A Learning-Centred Guide. Boston : Allyn and Bacon, 2003.
Jazzar, M., & Algozzine, B. (2007). Keys to successful 21st century educational leadership. Toronto: Pearson
Kaisit Plarin. (2009). Development of Instructional Leadership Indicators for Basic Education School Principals. Doctor of Education Thesis in Educational Administration, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]
Kamol Trachoo, Somjet Poosri and Siri Thee-asana. (2010). “Development of Indicators for Instructional Leadership Behaviors of Municipal School Principals”. Rajabhat Maha Sarakham University Journal; RMU.J. 5 (2) : May-August 2011. [in Thai]
Kamon Phooprasert. (2001). Academic administration in educational institutions. Bangkok : Polla Printing. [in Thai]
Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970). “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.
Krug, S. (1993). Leadership craft and the crafting of school leaders. Phi Delta Kappan, Nov. MacNeill, N and others. (2003). Beyond instructional leadership : towards pedagogic leadership. Paper submitted for presentation at the 2003 annual conference for the Australian Association for Research in Education : Auckland.
McEwan, Elain K. (1998). Seven Steps to Effective Instructional Leadership. California : Macmillan.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic Education Core Curriculum, 2008. Bangkok : Ministry of Education. [in Thai]
Ministry of Education. (2009). Educational reform proposal in the second decade (2009-2018). Education Secretariat. Bangkok : Sweet Pepper Graphic. [in Thai]
Murphy, J. (1990). “Principal instructional leadership”. Advances in Educational Administration, 1 (B: Changing perspectives on the school).
Panya Kaewkeeyoon and Sophat Phanphattanakul. (2002). Management of education in the form of using schools based or areas based. Bangkok : Office of Education Reform. [in Thai]
Phrathammpidok (P.A. Payutto). (1998). Leader. 2nd edition. Bangkok : Matichon. [in Thai] Prakong Rassameekaew. (2008). Administrators’ leadership traits in quality schools. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis (Educational Administration) : Silpakorn University. [in Thai]
Preeyaporn Wonganutrohd. (2010). Academic Administration. Bangkok : Phimdee Printing. [in Thai]
Progress Development Institute. (2010). Strategies for Professional Development of School Administrators according to the New Criteria. Bangkok : SPN Printing. [in Thai]
Secretariat of the Education Council. (2015). Thai educational performance in the international forum 2015 (IMD2015). Bangkok : Sweet Pepper Graphic.. [in Thai]
Secretariat of the Education Council. (2016). Thai educational performance in the international arena 2016 (IMD 2016). Bangkok : Graphic sweet pepper. [in Thai]
Secretariat of the Education Council. (2016B). Thailand Education Report 2014/2015: How to reform Thai education in the 21st century. Bangkok : Sweet Pepper Graphic.. [in Thai]
Shaffer, J. (2000). The Leadership solution. New York : McGrew-Hill. Teera Runcharoen. (2010). Professionalism in organizing and managing educational reform era. Bangkok : Sorghum. [in Thai]
Weerachat Wilasri. (2007). Instructional leadership of the school administratiors under the jurisdiction of chaiyaphum educational service area office 2. Master of Education thesis (Educational Administration) : Loei Rajabhat University. [in Thai]
Weerayut Chatakan. (2003). A Development of Education Status Indicators at Muban, Tambon, Amphoe and Changwat. Doctor of Education Thesis: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]