A Comparative Study of Quality of Life of Patients Who Underwent Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

Main Article Content

Shina Oranratanaphan Natacha Poolcharoen Chai Aiyasriwatthana Pongkasem Worasethsin

Abstract

Objectives:  To evaluate the effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) on the quality of life compares to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) method in Thailand.
Materials and Methods: After approval from ethical committee was achieved, the study was conducted. Euro-quality of life five dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire was used to evaluate quality of life. The questionnaire was given to the patients before surgery, day 1, 7 and 28 after operation. The patients were already assigned to perform TAH or TLH by their voluntariness. General characteristics and operative procedure including complications were also recorded. Data analysis was performed by using SPSS version 22.
Results: Hundred cases of TAH and 102 cases of TLH were collected. Baseline characteristics, diagnosis, operative time and complication rate were not difference. Educational level and income were slightly higher in TLH group. TLH had less blood loss and shorter hospital stay and had tendency to mobilize better than TAH group. The other aspects of quality of life such as pain, self-care and doing usual activity were similar. Anxiety score in both groups were improved after the operation.
Conclusion: TLH can reduce blood loss, hospital stay without increasing the complications. There were slightly differences in quality of life between group and the differences were found in only short term after the operation. TLH still had the benefit on faster recovery, shorter hospital stay and less blood loss.

Keywords

Article Details

Section
Original Article
Author Biographies

Natacha Poolcharoen, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

Chai Aiyasriwatthana, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

Pongkasem Worasethsin, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University

References

1. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:1091-5.
2. Garry R. Various approaches to laparoscopic hysterectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 6: 215-22.
3. Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG 2000;107:1380-5.
4. Lumsden MA, Twaddle S, Hawthorn R, Traynor I, Gilmore D, Davis J, et al. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG 2000; 107:1386-91.
5. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, Shafer A, Ridgway M, Skinner EN, et al. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:360.e1-9.
6. Victor R.P., Ronald R.W. Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. Springer International Publishing AG 2017:87-99.
7. Sakthong P. Measurement of clinical-effect: utility. J Med Assoc Thai 2008;91(Suppl 2):S43-52.
8. Radosa JC, Meyberg-Solomayer G, Kastl C, Radosa CG, Mavrova R, Gräber S, et al. Influences of different hysterectomy techniques on patients’ postoperative sexual function and quality of life. J Sex Med 2014;11: 2342-50.
9. Janda M, Gebski V, Brand A, Hogg R, Jobling TW, Land R, et al. Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomized trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:772-80.