Learning Styles of Muslim Students with Different Mother Tongues

Main Article Content

มิสรอ จูมะ ธัญภา พลานุกูลวงศ์

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate English learning styles of the upper secondary Muslim students who have Malay and Thai as their mother tongues. The participants included 136 participants who had Thai as their mother tongues and 51 participants who had Malay as their mother tongues. The instrument included a set of questionnaires on the subjects’ background information and learning styles which consisted of 6 categories 1) auditory 2) visual 3) tactile 4) kinesthetic 5) individual 6) group. Statistical descriptive analysis and t-test were applied. The findings were as follows: 1) the most preferred learning styles by the participants with Thai mother tongue were kinesthetic, group, auditory and respectively,                  2) the most preferred learning styles by the participants with Malay mother tongue were kinesthetic, group, tactile and respectively and 3) both groups of participants had similar learning styles of tactile, kinesthetic, individual, and group; the different learning styles were auditory and visual styles. The study suggested that the teachers in Islamic school should adapt the teaching styles to match with the learning styles of both Thai and Malay participants.

Keywords

Article Details

Section
Research article

References

1. Boonsuk, Y. (2009). English language Learning Styles of Pondok School Student in Southern Thailand. National Graduate Research Conference, 12, 1930-1939.

2. Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. (4th ed.). New York: Addison Wesley Longman.

3. Earley, C. & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural Intelligence: Individual interactions across Cultures. Stanford: Palo Alto, CA.

4. Hayikaleng, N. (2011).Comparisons of Problems in Teaching English at Upper Secondary level between Public Schools and Islamic Private Schools in Narathiwat. A Minor Thesis. Teaching English as an International Language, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University. (in Thai)

5. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W. & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. London: Sage Publications, Inc.

6. Hofstede, G. (2001). Cultures Consequences: Comparing Values, Behavior, Institutions and Organizations Across nations. (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications, Inc.

7. Jitmuad, S. (1992). Islamic Culture. Bangkok: Thangnum. (in Thai)

8. Khajornrit, B. (2007). Behavior of Teaching English of Foreign Teachers in the Opinion of Mathayom 1-3 Students at Private Schools in Pattaya City. Master’s Thesis of Curriculum and Instruction. Graduate School, Burapha University. (in Thai)

9. Keefe, J. W. (1982). Assessing student learning styles: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles and brain behavior (pp. 43-53). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

10. Kolb, A. D. (1981). Learning Style Inventory: A Self-Description of Preferred Learning Modes. Boston: Mc Bers.
Krejcie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.

11. Ministry of Education. (2001). The Basis Education B.E. 2544. (in Thai)

12. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House/Harper Collins.

13. Park, C. C. (2000). Learning Style Preferences of Southeast Asian Students. Urban Education, 35, 245-268.

14. Puthong, L. (2009). English Teaching Methodology in Elementary Schools in the Upper Northern Region of Thailand. Research Project from Faculty of liberal Arts. Chiang Mai: Maejo University. (in Thai)

15. Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL Students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87-111.

16. Reynolds, M. (1997). Learning Styles: A Critique. Management Learning, 28, 115-133.

17. Walberg, H. J. (1989). The Effective Teacher. New York: McGraw-Hill.